• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

咪达唑仑用于患者自控镇静时1分钟和3分钟锁定期的比较。

A comparison of 1- and 3-minute lockout periods during patient-controlled sedation with midazolam.

作者信息

Rodrigo C, Chow K C

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam.

出版信息

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995 Apr;53(4):406-10; discussion 410-1. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(95)90712-2.

DOI:10.1016/0278-2391(95)90712-2
PMID:7699494
Abstract

PURPOSE

The maximum effect of midazolam injected intravenously occurs in about 3 minutes. Patient-controlled sedation carried out with 1-mg increments of midazolam at 3-minute intervals provides comparable conditions to that of doctor-controlled sedation carried out with 1-mg increments at 1-minute intervals, except for the longer duration taken for the patients to achieve satisfactory sedation prior to surgery. The purpose of this study was to find out how safe it would be to shorten the interval of increments of midazolam to 1 minute in patient-controlled sedation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a randomized crossover study, 26 patients undergoing bilateral lower third molar surgery at two visits had patient-controlled sedation with 1 mg midazolam increments at 1-minute or 3-minute intervals at one visit and the alternative at the other visit.

RESULTS

The time taken for patients to achieve a degree of sedation that they thought was sufficient to tolerate the surgery was significantly longer when the increment interval was 3 minutes (t = -4.8; P < .05). Both techniques provided good operating conditions, stable vital signs, mild to moderate sedation, without loss of verbal contact.

CONCLUSION

A significant majority preferred the sedation technique with 1-minute increment intervals (chi 2 = 4.6; P < .05).

摘要

目的

静脉注射咪达唑仑的最大效果在约3分钟内出现。以1毫克的增量、每隔3分钟进行一次的患者自控镇静,与以1毫克的增量、每隔1分钟进行一次的医生控制镇静相比,能提供相当的条件,只是患者在手术前达到满意镇静所需的时间更长。本研究的目的是弄清楚在患者自控镇静中,将咪达唑仑增量的间隔缩短至1分钟有多安全。

患者与方法

在一项随机交叉研究中,26例接受双侧下颌第三磨牙手术的患者分两次就诊,一次就诊时以1分钟的间隔、每次增加1毫克咪达唑仑进行患者自控镇静,另一次就诊时则以3分钟的间隔进行。

结果

当增量间隔为3分钟时,患者达到他们认为足以耐受手术的镇静程度所需的时间明显更长(t = -4.8;P <.05)。两种技术均提供了良好的手术条件、稳定的生命体征、轻度至中度的镇静,且未丧失言语交流能力。

结论

绝大多数人更喜欢增量间隔为1分钟的镇静技术(χ2 = 4.6;P <.05)。

相似文献

1
A comparison of 1- and 3-minute lockout periods during patient-controlled sedation with midazolam.咪达唑仑用于患者自控镇静时1分钟和3分钟锁定期的比较。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995 Apr;53(4):406-10; discussion 410-1. doi: 10.1016/0278-2391(95)90712-2.
2
Comparison of two techniques of patient-controlled sedation with midazolam.两种咪达唑仑患者自控镇静技术的比较。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999 Dec;37(6):472-6. doi: 10.1054/bjom.1999.0118.
3
Patient-controlled sedation using midazolam.使用咪达唑仑的患者自控镇静
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994 Jun;32(3):168-73. doi: 10.1016/0266-4356(94)90103-1.
4
Patient-controlled sedation: a comparison of sedation prior to and until the end of minor oral surgery.
Aust Dent J. 1996 Jun;41(3):159-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1996.tb04847.x.
5
A comparison of midazolam and midazolam with remifentanil for patient-controlled sedation during operations on third molars.咪达唑仑与咪达唑仑联合瑞芬太尼用于第三磨牙手术中患者自控镇静的比较。
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Apr;45(3):212-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2006.06.002. Epub 2006 Aug 23.
6
Assessment of recovery in patients undergoing intravenous conscious sedation using bispectral analysis.使用双谱分析评估接受静脉清醒镇静患者的恢复情况。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001 Jun;59(6):603-11; discussion 611-2. doi: 10.1053/joms.2001.23366.
7
Comparison of transmucosal midazolam with inhalation sedation for dental extractions in children. A randomized, cross-over, clinical trial.儿童拔牙时经黏膜咪达唑仑与吸入镇静的比较:一项随机、交叉临床试验。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007 Sep;51(8):1062-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01391.x.
8
Randomized, controlled, cross-over clinical trial comparing intravenous midazolam sedation with nitrous oxide sedation in children undergoing dental extractions.一项随机、对照、交叉临床试验,比较静脉注射咪达唑仑镇静与一氧化二氮镇静用于拔牙儿童的效果。
Br J Anaesth. 2003 Dec;91(6):850-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg278.
9
Multidrug intravenous sedation: determinants of the sedative dose of midazolam.多药静脉镇静:咪达唑仑镇静剂量的决定因素
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1997 Jul;84(1):5-10. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(97)90285-7.
10
Comparing efficacy and safety of four intravenous sedation regimens in dental outpatients.比较四种静脉镇静方案在牙科门诊患者中的疗效和安全性。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2001 Jun;132(6):740-51. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0271.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Intravenous Midazolam with Nasal Spray for Conscious Sedation in Minor Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeries.静脉注射咪达唑仑与鼻喷雾剂用于小型口腔颌面外科手术清醒镇静的比较分析
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2019 Feb;11(Suppl 1):S42-S50. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_199_18.
2
Comparitive Evaluation of Propofol and Midazolam as Conscious Sedatives in Minor Oral Surgery.丙泊酚与咪达唑仑作为小型口腔手术清醒镇静剂的比较评价
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015 Sep;14(3):773-83. doi: 10.1007/s12663-014-0676-y. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
3
Patient-controlled sedation.
患者自控镇静
Anesth Prog. 1998 Summer;45(3):117-26.