Hingorani K
Curr Med Res Opin. 1976;4(1):57-64. doi: 10.1185/03007997609109282.
A double-blind crossover study in 41 patients with knee joint osteoarthrosis was carried out to compare the efficacy of 1200 mg. azapropazone per day with 1600 mg. ibuprofen per day. After an initial week on placebo, patients received one or other of the active medications for 2 weeks, then a 1-week placebo wash-out period before being crossed over to the alternative drug for a further 2 weeks. Objective assessments were made of knee joint movement, and of knee joint and thigh circumference. Patients made daily assessments of pain and a final overall assessment of preference for one or other treatment period. The results showed that azapropazone produced a significant improvement (p less than 0.05) in knee joint mobility over placebo, both active drugs were more effective than placebo (p less than 0.05) in providing pain relief, but that there was no significant difference between the two in these parameters. There was a highly significant patient preference, however, for azapropazone (p less than 0.01) compared to ibuprofen treatment periods. The most commonly reported side-effect with both drugs was dyspepsia, but in no case was it sufficiently severe to necessitate stopping treatment.
对41例膝关节骨关节炎患者进行了一项双盲交叉研究,以比较每日服用1200毫克阿扎丙宗与每日服用1600毫克布洛芬的疗效。在最初一周服用安慰剂后,患者服用其中一种活性药物2周,然后经过1周的安慰剂洗脱期,再交叉服用另一种药物2周。对膝关节活动度、膝关节和大腿周长进行了客观评估。患者每天对疼痛进行评估,并对一个或另一个治疗期的偏好进行最终总体评估。结果显示,与安慰剂相比,阿扎丙宗在膝关节活动度方面有显著改善(p<0.05),两种活性药物在缓解疼痛方面均比安慰剂更有效(p<0.05),但在这些参数上两者之间没有显著差异。然而,与布洛芬治疗期相比,患者对阿扎丙宗有高度显著的偏好(p<0.01)。两种药物最常报告的副作用是消化不良,但在任何情况下都没有严重到需要停止治疗。