• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

C阶段,自动睡眠评分:健康老年男性和女性的开发及与人工睡眠评分的比较

C STAGE, automated sleep scoring: development and comparison with human sleep scoring for healthy older men and women.

作者信息

Prinz P N, Larsen L H, Moe K E, Dulberg E M, Vitiello M V

机构信息

Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Research Service, American Lake VAMC, Tacoma, Washington.

出版信息

Sleep. 1994 Dec;17(8):711-7.

PMID:7701182
Abstract

Using the sleep records of 200 men and women (age 55-85 years), we have developed a human-assisted computer scoring system, C STAGE. The system can have many applications, including quantitative electroencephalographic (EEG) analysis during specific stages of sleep. C STAGE classifies sleep/wake stages using power spectral analysis and other techniques applied to one channel of EEG data. Here we report comparability data between C STAGE- and human-rated sleep-stage scoring using Rechtschaffen and Kales criteria for 70 normal subjects (a subset of the 200). Because the method was developed using these subjects, we also report comparability data for an independent validation sample of 45 normal older men and women. For waking measures, sleep stages 3 and 4, and total sleep time, C STAGE yielded ratings comparable with the human rater (r = 0.73-0.91; p < 0.001). For sleep stages 1 and 2 and REM sleep, C STAGE correlated less well with human ratings (r = 0.59-0.81; p < 0.001). Overall, these correlations compare well with other currently available computer stage-scoring methods. Epoch-by-epoch comparisons in the validation sample revealed a mean proportion of agreement of 0.74 and a mean Kappa coefficient of 0.57, indicating the two methods provide reasonable agreement on an epoch-by-epoch basis. We conclude that C STAGE is a valid sleep/waking scoring system for healthy older adults.

摘要

利用200名年龄在55至85岁之间的男性和女性的睡眠记录,我们开发了一种人工辅助的计算机评分系统C STAGE。该系统有许多应用,包括在睡眠特定阶段进行定量脑电图(EEG)分析。C STAGE使用功率谱分析和应用于单通道EEG数据的其他技术对睡眠/清醒阶段进行分类。在此,我们报告了使用Rechtschaffen和Kales标准对70名正常受试者(200名受试者的一个子集)进行C STAGE评分与人工评分之间的可比性数据。由于该方法是使用这些受试者开发的,我们还报告了45名正常老年男性和女性的独立验证样本的可比性数据。对于清醒测量、睡眠3期和4期以及总睡眠时间,C STAGE得出的评分与人工评分相当(r = 0.73 - 0.91;p < 0.001)。对于睡眠1期和2期以及快速眼动睡眠,C STAGE与人工评分的相关性较差(r = 0.59 - 0.81;p < 0.001)。总体而言,这些相关性与其他目前可用的计算机阶段评分方法相比表现良好。验证样本中的逐段比较显示,一致性的平均比例为0.74,平均卡帕系数为0.57,表明这两种方法在逐段基础上提供了合理的一致性。我们得出结论,C STAGE是一种适用于健康老年人的有效睡眠/清醒评分系统。

相似文献

1
C STAGE, automated sleep scoring: development and comparison with human sleep scoring for healthy older men and women.C阶段,自动睡眠评分:健康老年男性和女性的开发及与人工睡眠评分的比较
Sleep. 1994 Dec;17(8):711-7.
2
An E-health solution for automatic sleep classification according to Rechtschaffen and Kales: validation study of the Somnolyzer 24 x 7 utilizing the Siesta database.一种基于 Rechtschaffen 和 Kales 标准的用于自动睡眠分类的电子健康解决方案:利用 Siesta 数据库对 Somnolyzer 24 x 7 进行的验证研究。
Neuropsychobiology. 2005;51(3):115-33. doi: 10.1159/000085205. Epub 2005 Apr 18.
3
Differentiation of normal and disturbed sleep by automatic analysis.通过自动分析区分正常睡眠和异常睡眠。
Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1983;526:1-103.
4
Inter-rater reliability of sleep cyclic alternating pattern (CAP) scoring and validation of a new computer-assisted CAP scoring method.睡眠周期交替模式(CAP)评分的评分者间信度及一种新的计算机辅助CAP评分方法的验证
Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Mar;116(3):696-707. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.09.021. Epub 2004 Nov 10.
5
Scoring accuracy of automated sleep staging from a bipolar electroocular recording compared to manual scoring by multiple raters.双极眼动记录的自动睡眠分期与多位评分者的手动评分的准确性比较。
Sleep Med. 2013 Nov;14(11):1199-207. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2013.04.022. Epub 2013 Aug 16.
6
Automatic sleep stage classification using two-channel electro-oculography.使用双通道眼电图进行自动睡眠阶段分类。
J Neurosci Methods. 2007 Oct 15;166(1):109-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.06.016. Epub 2007 Jun 28.
7
Interobserver agreement among sleep scorers from different centers in a large dataset.大型数据集中不同中心的睡眠评分者之间的观察者间一致性。
Sleep. 2000 Nov 1;23(7):901-8.
8
The visual scoring of sleep and arousal in infants and children.婴幼儿睡眠与觉醒的视觉评分
J Clin Sleep Med. 2007 Mar 15;3(2):201-40.
9
Interrater reliability for sleep scoring according to the Rechtschaffen & Kales and the new AASM standard.根据 Rechtschaffen & Kales 标准和新的美国睡眠医学学会(AASM)标准进行睡眠评分的评分者间信度。
J Sleep Res. 2009 Mar;18(1):74-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.2008.00700.x.
10
The visual scoring of sleep in adults.成人睡眠的视觉评分
J Clin Sleep Med. 2007 Mar 15;3(2):121-31.

引用本文的文献

1
Scoring sleep with artificial intelligence enables quantification of sleep stage ambiguity: hypnodensity based on multiple expert scorers and auto-scoring.人工智能评分可量化睡眠分期的不明确性:基于多位专家评分和自动评分的催眠密度。
Sleep. 2023 Feb 8;46(2). doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsac154.
2
Manual vs. automated analysis of polysomnographic recordings in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的多导睡眠图记录的手动与自动分析。
Sleep Breath. 2013 May;17(2):533-9. doi: 10.1007/s11325-012-0714-2. Epub 2012 May 10.
3
Fully parametric sleep staging compatible with the classical criteria.
完全参数化的睡眠分期与经典标准兼容。
Neuroinformatics. 2009 Dec;7(4):245-53. doi: 10.1007/s12021-009-9059-9.
4
Automatic analysis of single-channel sleep EEG: validation in healthy individuals.单通道睡眠脑电图的自动分析:在健康个体中的验证
Sleep. 2007 Nov;30(11):1587-95. doi: 10.1093/sleep/30.11.1587.