Suppr超能文献

[采用双盲法对82例精神分裂症患者进行舒必利与奋乃静临床疗效的研究]

[Study of the clinical effects of sulpiride and perphenazine in 82 schizophrenic patients by the double blind method].

作者信息

Asada S, Ishimaru T, Kubo S, Kodama H, Masuda K

出版信息

Encephale. 1976;2(1):73-83.

PMID:770152
Abstract

Our clinical and statistical evaluation of Sulpiride and Perphenazine was carried out over a 10 week period, in 82 patients of both sexes, aged 20 to 56 years. All were chronic patients with a symptomatic profile of apathy, lack of initiative but with the personality relatively well preserved in 56 patients. The daily dosage varied from 300 to 1,200 mg Sulpiride orally and 12 to 48 mg Perphenazine. The effects of therapy have been received globally and individually at the beginning, 4th, 8th, and the end of the 10th week using the B.P.R.S. modified by the clinic of Neurology and Psychiatry of the University of Hiroshima. Using "Armitage's Restricted Sequential Design", there was no significant difference between the therapeutic effects of these 2 neuroleptics. However, Sulpiride appeared more beneficial following the review during the 8th week and the 4th week.

摘要

我们对舒必利和奋乃静进行了为期10周的临床和统计学评估,研究对象为82名年龄在20至56岁之间的男女慢性患者。所有患者均表现为淡漠、缺乏主动性等症状,其中56名患者的人格相对保持完好。舒必利口服剂量为每日300至1200毫克,奋乃静为12至48毫克。在第10周开始、第4周、第8周和结束时,使用广岛大学神经精神病学诊所修改后的简明精神病评定量表(B.P.R.S.)对治疗效果进行了整体和个体评估。采用“阿米蒂奇受限序贯设计”,这两种抗精神病药物的治疗效果无显著差异。然而,在第8周和第4周复查时,舒必利似乎更有益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验