Lepola U, Koskinen T, Rimón R, Salo H, Gordin A
Harjamäki Mental Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1989 Jul;80(1):92-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1989.tb01305.x.
Seventeen patients with acute schizophrenia and 30 with chronic schizophrenia were included in a randomized, double-blind parallel-group trial comparing sulpiride and perphenazine. Patients were evaluated using the 16-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) prior to the onset of treatment and 1 and 2 weeks, and 1, 2, 3, and 4 months thereafter. In patients with acute schizophrenia, total BPRS scores declined significantly at the end of the trial compared with pretreatment values in sulpiride-treated patients but not in schizophrenics treated with perphenazine. Differences in response between the groups did not reach statistical significance, however. For patients suffering from chronic schizophrenia, a statistically significant decline was observed in total BPRS scores at 4 months compared with pretreatment scores in both sulpiride and perphenazine groups. There was no significant difference in the treatment response between the groups. Sulpiride appeared to be somewhat more effective than perphenazine for treatment of acute schizophrenia. Efficacy of both compounds was less marked in chronic forms of schizophrenia.
17名急性精神分裂症患者和30名慢性精神分裂症患者被纳入一项比较舒必利和奋乃静的随机、双盲平行组试验。在治疗开始前、治疗1周和2周以及之后的1、2、3和4个月,使用16项简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)对患者进行评估。在急性精神分裂症患者中,与治疗前相比,舒必利治疗组患者在试验结束时BPRS总分显著下降,而奋乃静治疗的精神分裂症患者则未出现这种情况。然而,两组之间的反应差异未达到统计学显著性。对于慢性精神分裂症患者,与治疗前相比,舒必利组和奋乃静组在4个月时BPRS总分均出现统计学显著性下降。两组之间的治疗反应无显著差异。舒必利在治疗急性精神分裂症方面似乎比奋乃静更有效。两种药物在慢性精神分裂症中的疗效均不太明显。