Suppr超能文献

五种不同抗生素治疗方案用于治疗非复杂性沙眼衣原体宫颈炎的成本效益分析。

Cost-effectiveness analysis of five different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of uncomplicated Chlamydia trachomatis cervicitis.

作者信息

Nuovo J, Melnikow J, Paliescheskey M, King J, Mowers R

机构信息

Department of Family Practice, University of California, Davis 95817, USA.

出版信息

J Am Board Fam Pract. 1995 Jan-Feb;8(1):7-16.

PMID:7701965
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention treatment guidelines for Chlamydia trachomatis include two recently available drugs, azithromycin and ofloxacin. The best choice for initial therapy remains controversial.

OBJECTIVES

We wanted to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of five different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of uncomplicated Chlamydia trachomatis cervicitis.

METHODS

Using information gathered from a MEDLINE search of the English language literature from 1966 to 1994, employing the key words "cervicitis," "C. trachomatis," "erythromycin," "tetracycline," "doxycycline," "ofloxacin," and "azithromycin," we developed a decision analysis model specific for a nonpregnant woman with uncomplicated Chlamydia trachomatis cervicitis. Options in this model included an initially cured infection, a failed initial cure resulting in persistent cervicitis, or pelvic inflammatory disease treated either on an inpatient or outpatient basis. Probability estimates for each option were derived from previously published reports. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed for three end points: cost per cure with initial therapy, cost per case of pelvic inflammatory disease averted, and cost per hospitalization averted. Sensitivity analyses were done by varying the cure rates for each antibiotic and the complication rates for failed therapy. The costs incurred for treatment were also varied.

RESULTS

Using the high estimate for initial cure rates, doxycycline and tetracycline were the most cost-effective agents. Azithromycin was the next most cost-effective agent, followed by ofloxacin and erythromycin. To achieve an equivalent final cost, the probability of initial cure with azithromycin must exceed that of doxycycline by 3 percentage points. As the cost of azithromycin decreases, the difference in initial cure rates between the two drugs to achieve an equivalent final cost becomes smaller.

CONCLUSIONS

Doxycycline remains the drug of choice in the treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis cervicitis. The results favor the use of azithromycin rather than doxycycline when there is concern for compliance to the standard doxycycline regimen. A lower cost for azithromycin could favor its use as the drug of choice.

摘要

背景

美国疾病控制与预防中心关于沙眼衣原体的新治疗指南纳入了两种近期可用的药物,阿奇霉素和氧氟沙星。初始治疗的最佳选择仍存在争议。

目的

我们想对五种不同抗生素治疗方案用于治疗非复杂性沙眼衣原体宫颈炎进行成本效益分析。

方法

利用从1966年至1994年英文文献的MEDLINE检索中收集的信息,使用关键词“宫颈炎”、“沙眼衣原体”、“红霉素”、“四环素”、“多西环素”、“氧氟沙星”和“阿奇霉素”,我们开发了一个针对患有非复杂性沙眼衣原体宫颈炎的非孕妇的决策分析模型。该模型中的选项包括初始治愈的感染、初始治愈失败导致持续性宫颈炎,或住院或门诊治疗的盆腔炎。每个选项的概率估计均来自先前发表的报告。针对三个终点进行了成本效益分析:初始治疗每治愈一例的成本、避免每例盆腔炎的成本以及避免每次住院的成本。通过改变每种抗生素的治愈率和治疗失败的并发症发生率进行敏感性分析。治疗产生的成本也有所变化。

结果

采用初始治愈率的高估值时,多西环素和四环素是最具成本效益的药物。阿奇霉素是次最具成本效益的药物,其次是氧氟沙星和红霉素。为了达到同等的最终成本,阿奇霉素初始治愈的概率必须比多西环素超过3个百分点。随着阿奇霉素成本的降低,两种药物达到同等最终成本时初始治愈率的差异会变小。

结论

多西环素仍然是治疗沙眼衣原体宫颈炎的首选药物。当担心对标准多西环素治疗方案的依从性时,结果支持使用阿奇霉素而非多西环素。阿奇霉素较低的成本可能有利于其作为首选药物使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验