Suppr超能文献

阿奇霉素与多西环素治疗女性沙眼衣原体感染的成本效益分析:加拿大视角

Cost effectiveness analysis of azithromycin and doxycycline for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women: A Canadian perspective.

作者信息

Marra F, Marra C A, Patrick D M

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre; Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Division of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia; Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research Program, British Columbia's Children's and Women's Hospitals, Vancouver, British Columbia.

出版信息

Can J Infect Dis. 1997 Jul;8(4):202-8. doi: 10.1155/1997/870203.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the cost effectiveness of azithromycin versus doxycycline therapy for cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infections in Canada.

DESIGN

A predictive decision analytic model using previously published clinical and economic evaluations, expert opinion and costs of medical care in Canada.

POPULATION

A hypothetical cohort of 5000 women followed over 10 years.

INTERVENTIONS

Two diagnostic strategies were compared, laboratory confirmed diagnosis (LCD) and presumptive diagnosis (PD) of C trachomatis infection. Under each strategy, two treatment alternatives were analyzed, a single 1 g dose of azithromycin and a seven-day course of doxycycline as 100 mg twice daily.

RESULTS

Despite a fourfold higher acquisition cost, under base case conditions, for both diagnostic strategies, the azithromycin treatment alternative was more cost effective than the doxycycline alternative. For the LCD model, the cost per cure for patients receiving azithromycin was $184.76 compared with $240.59 for patients receiving doxycycline, resulting in an incremental cost of $55.83. For the PD model, the cost per cure for patients treated with azithromycin was $51.48 compared with $51.82, resulting in an incremental cost of $0.34. For the hypothetical cohort of 5000 women, the use of azithromycin translates into a projected annual cost savings of $279,150 and $1,700 for the LCD and PD models, respectively. In one-way sensitivity analyses for the LCD model, no clinically plausible changes in the base case estimates changed the results of the cost effectiveness outcome. In the PD model, clinically plausible changes in the probabilities of doxycycline cure, pelvic inflammatory disease, sequelae and chlamydia infection were found to alter the cost effectiveness outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the results from our model, the azithromycin strategy should be employed for the treatment of laboratory confirmed cases. However, for presumptive cases, azithromycin should be used only if the probabilities of C trachomatis and pelvic inflammatory disease are more than 19%, doxycycline effectiveness is less than 78%, or the cost of azithromycin is less than $19.00.

摘要

目的

评估阿奇霉素与多西环素治疗加拿大宫颈沙眼衣原体感染的成本效益。

设计

采用先前发表的临床和经济评估、专家意见以及加拿大医疗保健成本构建预测性决策分析模型。

研究对象

一个假设的5000名女性队列,随访10年。

干预措施

比较两种诊断策略,即沙眼衣原体感染的实验室确诊诊断(LCD)和推定诊断(PD)。在每种策略下,分析两种治疗方案,单次1克剂量的阿奇霉素和为期7天、每日两次、每次100毫克的多西环素疗程。

结果

尽管阿奇霉素的采购成本高出四倍,但在基础病例条件下,对于两种诊断策略,阿奇霉素治疗方案均比多西环素方案更具成本效益。对于LCD模型,接受阿奇霉素治疗的患者每治愈一例的成本为184.76美元,而接受多西环素治疗的患者为240.59美元,增量成本为55.83美元。对于PD模型,接受阿奇霉素治疗的患者每治愈一例的成本为51.48美元,多西环素为51.82美元,增量成本为0.34美元。对于假设的5000名女性队列,使用阿奇霉素预计每年分别为LCD和PD模型节省成本279,150美元和1,700美元。在LCD模型的单向敏感性分析中,基础病例估计中任何临床上合理的变化都未改变成本效益结果。在PD模型中,发现多西环素治愈率、盆腔炎、后遗症和衣原体感染概率的临床上合理变化会改变成本效益结果。

结论

根据我们模型的结果,阿奇霉素策略应用于治疗实验室确诊病例。然而,对于推定病例,仅当沙眼衣原体和盆腔炎的概率超过19%、多西环素有效性低于78%或阿奇霉素成本低于19.00美元时,才应使用阿奇霉素。

相似文献

5
The cost effectiveness of azithromycin for Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women.
Sex Transm Dis. 1995 Sep-Oct;22(5):274-80. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199509000-00002.
6
A cost-effectiveness analysis of screening and treatment for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in asymptomatic women.
Ann Intern Med. 1996 Jan 1;124(1 Pt 1):1-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-124-1_part_1-199601010-00001.
10
An economic evaluation of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in adolescent males.
JAMA. 1993 Nov 3;270(17):2057-64. doi: 10.1001/jama.1993.03510170047029.

引用本文的文献

1
Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a systematic review of the economic evaluations and modelling.
Sex Transm Infect. 2006 Jun;82(3):193-200; discussion 201. doi: 10.1136/sti.2005.017517.
2
Treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in pregnant women.
Drugs. 2000 Sep;60(3):597-605. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200060030-00006.
3
Chlamydia trachomatis in adolescents and adults. Clinical and economic implications.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Feb;13(2):191-222. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199813020-00004.

本文引用的文献

2
Single dose of azithromycin for the treatment of genital chlamydial infections in adolescents.
J Pediatr. 1993 Jun;122(6):961-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(09)90029-4.
3
Atypical pelvic inflammatory disease: can we identify clinical predictors?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Aug;169(2 Pt 1):341-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90085-w.
5
Single dose azithromycin treatment of gonorrhea and infections caused by C. trachomatis and U. urealyticum in men.
Sex Transm Dis. 1994 Jan-Feb;21(1):43-6. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199401000-00009.
6
Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in fallopian tube tissue in women with postinfectious tubal infertility.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Jul;171(1):95-101. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70084-2.
7
Drug therapies for sexually transmitted diseases. Clinical and economic considerations.
Drugs. 1995 Apr;49(4):496-515. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199549040-00002.
9
New opportunities for Chlamydia prevention: applications of science to public health practice.
Sex Transm Dis. 1995 May-Jun;22(3):197-202. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199505000-00011.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验