Helm M, Lampl L, Hauke J, Bock K H
Abteilung für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Ulm.
Anaesthesist. 1995 Feb;44(2):101-7.
Trauma patients are at great risk of accidental hypothermia (body temperature [BT] < 36 degrees C). Hypothermia influences the functioning of all organ systems and can lead to pathological changes, which in turn additionally complicate the trauma. Furthermore, hypothermia can, e.g., by influencing blood coagulation (reduction of thrombocyte aggregation, increased fibrinolysis) have a markedly unfavourable impact upon the in-hospital surgical treatment of the trauma patient. In a prospective study involving 302 trauma patients treated during primary helicopter rescue missions over a 1-year period, we studied the following factors: (1) incidence and degree of severity of hypothermia; (2) seasonal influence; (3) possibility of individual risk groups within the study group; (4) changes in BT during the prehospital treatment phase; and (5) their consequences for emergency treatment. METHOD. BT was taken upon commencement of emergency treatment and upon release of the patient to the receiving hospital. To avoid possible damage to the patient's tympanic membrane by the thermometer probe, we excluded all patients under 16 years of age and those with an indication of an ear or temporal-bone injury. In all cases standardized patient positioning was applied. The statistical evaluation was performed utilizing descriptive presentations and the Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square test. RESULTS. During study period, a total of 302 trauma patients were treated. On 228 of these, prehospital temperature monitoring was performed (151 males and 77 females, average age 41.8 years). Because of the established criteria for exceptions and equipment malfunction, no monitoring was performed on 74 patients. Traffic accidents (69%) were the major cause of injury (Table 2), predominantly the group with NACA III (32%), followed by NACA IV (22%) and NACA V (18%) (Table 3); 27% had multi-system trauma. BT monitoring disclosed that 49.6% or almost every second trauma patient, had hypothermia. The proportion of hypothermia II degrees (BT 34 degrees-30 degrees C) versus hypothermia III degrees (BT < 30 degrees C) was 6.6% to 0.5%. Our statistical evaluation did not disclose any significant connection between season of the year and frequency of accidental hypothermia. Special risk factors in regard to frequency and degree of severity turned out to be "entrapment" (98.1% of patients with an entrapment trauma [ET] versus 34.5% without such; P < 0.001) and age (56.8% of patients > 65 years of age without ET and 100% with ET; P < 0.001) (Figs. 2, 3). No significant changes in BT were noted during the prehospital treatment phase. Clinical symptoms pointing to hypothermia or other indicators, i.e., shivering, were only noted in 4.4% of the cases where the patients BT was below normal. CONCLUSION. Based upon our findings, accidental hypothermia poses a relevant problem in the prehospital treatment of trauma patients. It is not limited to a special season of the year. The variability or total absence of definite diagnostic symptoms underlines the necessity for prehospital BT monitoring, whereby tympanic-membrane thermometry has proven to be a worthwhile method.
创伤患者极易发生意外体温过低(体温[BT]<36摄氏度)。体温过低会影响所有器官系统的功能,并可能导致病理变化,进而使创伤情况更加复杂。此外,体温过低例如通过影响血液凝固(血小板聚集减少、纤维蛋白溶解增加),会对创伤患者的院内外科治疗产生明显不利影响。在一项为期1年的前瞻性研究中,我们对在首次直升机救援任务中治疗的302例创伤患者进行了研究,研究了以下因素:(1)体温过低的发生率和严重程度;(2)季节影响;(3)研究组内个体风险组的可能性;(4)院前治疗阶段体温的变化;(5)它们对急诊治疗的影响。方法:在急诊治疗开始时以及患者转送至接收医院时测量体温。为避免温度计探头可能对患者鼓膜造成损伤,我们排除了所有16岁以下患者以及有耳部或颞骨损伤迹象的患者。所有病例均采用标准化的患者体位。采用描述性统计以及曼-惠特尼U检验和卡方检验进行统计评估。结果:在研究期间,共治疗了302例创伤患者。其中228例进行了院前体温监测(男性151例,女性77例,平均年龄41.8岁)。由于既定的排除标准和设备故障,74例患者未进行监测。交通事故(69%)是主要致伤原因(表2),主要是美国麻醉医师协会(NACA)III级组(32%),其次是NACA IV级组(22%)和NACA V级组(18%)(表3);27%的患者有多系统创伤。体温监测显示,49.6%即几乎每两名创伤患者中就有一名体温过低。体温过低II度(体温34摄氏度至30摄氏度)与体温过低III度(体温<30摄氏度)的比例为6.6%至0.5%。我们的统计评估未发现一年中的季节与意外体温过低频率之间存在任何显著关联。在发生频率和严重程度方面,特殊风险因素为“被困”(被困创伤[ET]患者中98.1%体温过低,无此类创伤患者中为34.5%;P<0.001)和年龄(65岁以上无ET患者中56.8%体温过低,有ET患者中100%体温过低;P<0.001)(图2、3)。院前治疗阶段未发现体温有显著变化。仅在4.4%体温低于正常的患者病例中发现了指向体温过低或其他指标(即寒战)的临床症状。结论:根据我们的研究结果,意外体温过低在创伤患者的院前治疗中是一个相关问题。它并不局限于一年中的特定季节。明确诊断症状的变异性或完全缺失凸显了院前体温监测的必要性,事实证明鼓膜测温是一种值得采用的方法。