Marchant J, Bush A
Department of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton Hospital, London.
Arch Dis Child. 1995 Feb;72(2):156-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.72.2.156.
Lung function apparatus may be a source of cross infection in patients with cystic fibrosis and may be prevented using a 'bag in bottle' system. As this system has never been validated in children the flow volume loops performed using a Vitalograph Compact in the usual way were compared with results obtained blowing into the bag and bottle system, in random order, in 20 children with asthma (age 8-15 years). Three reproducible flow volume loops were recorded for each apparatus. There was no order effect. Mean (SE) results for forced expiratory volume in one second, forced vital capacity (FVC), peak expiratory flow rate, and maximum expiratory flow at between 75% and 25% of FVC showed respectively that the bag in bottle results were significantly greater than those obtained blowing directly into the spirometer by 90 (17) ml, 12.7 (5.1) l/min, 130 (60) ml/min. Although statistically significant, these differences are within the previously described coefficients of variation for children with cystic fibrosis and are of doubtful clinical relevance. It is concluded that the bag in bottle system does not introduce any important systematic error. It potentially offers absolute protection from cross infection.
肺功能仪可能是囊性纤维化患者交叉感染的一个来源,使用“瓶中袋”系统可预防交叉感染。由于该系统从未在儿童中得到验证,因此对20名哮喘儿童(8 - 15岁)以随机顺序,将使用维托拉夫紧凑型肺功能仪按常规方式进行的流量容积环检测结果与向袋瓶系统吹气所获得的结果进行了比较。每种仪器记录三个可重复的流量容积环。不存在顺序效应。一秒用力呼气容积、用力肺活量(FVC)、呼气峰值流速以及FVC的75%至25%之间的最大呼气流量的平均(SE)结果分别显示,袋瓶系统的结果比直接向肺量计吹气所获得的结果显著大90(17)毫升、12.7(5.1)升/分钟、130(60)毫升/分钟。尽管这些差异具有统计学意义,但它们在先前描述的囊性纤维化儿童的变异系数范围内,临床相关性存疑。结论是,袋瓶系统不会引入任何重要的系统误差。它有可能提供绝对的交叉感染防护。