Clark J, Grabs A J, Parsons P G, Smithers B M, Addison R S, Roberts M S
Queensland Cancer Fund Laboratories, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Herston, Australia.
Melanoma Res. 1994 Dec;4(6):365-70. doi: 10.1097/00008390-199412000-00004.
Isolated limb perfusion with melphalan is a long-standing treatment for melanoma but the clinical conditions have not been subjected to a systematic evaluation. In order to establish optimal conditions for perfusion, three human melanoma cell lines were cultured with melphalan in vitro under conditions comparable to in vivo therapy. The most important findings were that: (a) 41.5 degrees C was synergistic for melphalan killing of three human melanoma cell lines; (b) prolonging the treatment time beyond 1 h had little additional toxicity; and (c) varying the initial pH of the culture medium had no effect. After 1 h of treatment, cells accumulated more melphalan at 41.5 degrees C than at 37 degrees C, relative to the extracellular concentration. A cell line (MM418) derived from a primary tumour was the most resistant of the three lines; pigmented or non-pigmented sublines were equally resistant. The A2058 line showed the lowest level of synergism with hyperthermia, and displayed a marked plateau at 10% of controls in the dose-response for survival, yet no melphalan-resistant subpopulation could be isolated. The implications of this work are that (a) enhanced cellular uptake of melphalan may account for hyperthermic synergism of melphalan; (b) varying conditions other than treatment time will be necessary to deal with the variation in resistance between tumours; and (c) repeated cycles of treatment may be needed for phenotypes such as A2058 where melphalan resistance appears to be based on an epigenetic mechanism.
美法仑隔离肢体灌注是一种长期用于治疗黑色素瘤的方法,但临床情况尚未得到系统评估。为了确定最佳灌注条件,在体外与体内治疗相当的条件下,用美法仑培养三种人黑色素瘤细胞系。最重要的发现是:(a) 41.5℃对美法仑杀伤三种人黑色素瘤细胞系具有协同作用;(b) 将治疗时间延长超过1小时几乎没有额外毒性;(c) 改变培养基的初始pH值没有影响。治疗1小时后,相对于细胞外浓度,细胞在41.5℃比在37℃积累了更多的美法仑。来自原发性肿瘤的细胞系(MM418)是这三种细胞系中最耐药的;色素沉着或无色素沉着的亚系耐药性相同。A2058细胞系与热疗的协同作用水平最低,在生存剂量反应中,在对照的10%处显示出明显的平台期,但未分离出美法仑耐药亚群。这项工作的意义在于:(a) 美法仑细胞摄取增强可能是美法仑热疗协同作用的原因;(b) 除治疗时间外,需要改变其他条件来应对肿瘤之间耐药性的差异;(c) 对于美法仑耐药似乎基于表观遗传机制的A2058等表型,可能需要重复治疗周期。