• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生命教育的毒品教育项目对公共健康有益吗?

Does Life Education's drug education programme have a public health benefit?

作者信息

Hawthorne G, Garrard J, Dunt D

机构信息

National Centre for Health Program Evaluation, University of Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Addiction. 1995 Feb;90(2):205-15. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1995.9022056.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1360-0443.1995.9022056.x
PMID:7703814
Abstract

The Life Education organization offers a drug education programme to an estimated one million Australian primary schoolchildren. It is believed the programme delays experimentation with or initiation into smoking, alcohol use and the taking of analgesics. This study examined the short-term public health effects on 3000 11- and 12-year-old students, of whom 1700 were exposed to 5 consecutive years of the programme. The other 1300 students were not exposed to the programme. After controlling for the known predictors of social drug use there was no evidence that Life Education students, when compared with students receiving conventional school-based drug education, were less likely to have smoked, were less likely to have drunk or were less likely to have used analgesics. Indeed, the evidence suggested that Life Education-students were slightly more likely to use these substances, and that the programme had different effects on boys' and girls' drug use. Given that these findings are consistent with previous research evaluating similar drug education programmes, it is hypothesized they are most likely to do with the design of the programme itself.

摘要

生命教育组织为大约100万澳大利亚小学生提供毒品教育项目。据信该项目会推迟学生尝试吸烟、饮酒和服用镇痛药的时间或首次进行这些行为的时间。本研究调查了该项目对3000名11至12岁学生的短期公共卫生影响,其中1700名学生连续5年参与该项目,另外1300名学生未参与该项目。在控制了已知的社会毒品使用预测因素后,没有证据表明参与生命教育项目的学生与接受传统校内毒品教育的学生相比,吸烟、饮酒或使用镇痛药的可能性更低。事实上,有证据表明参与生命教育项目的学生使用这些物质的可能性略高,并且该项目对男孩和女孩的毒品使用有不同影响。鉴于这些发现与之前评估类似毒品教育项目的研究一致,据推测这很可能与项目本身的设计有关。

相似文献

1
Does Life Education's drug education programme have a public health benefit?生命教育的毒品教育项目对公共健康有益吗?
Addiction. 1995 Feb;90(2):205-15. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1995.9022056.x.
2
The social impact of Life Education: estimating drug use prevalence among Victorian primary school students and the statewide effect of the Life Education programme.生命教育的社会影响:评估维多利亚州小学生的药物使用流行率以及生命教育计划在全州范围内的效果。
Addiction. 1996 Aug;91(8):1151-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1996.91811517.x.
3
Preteenage drug use in Australia: the key predictors and school-based drug education.澳大利亚青少年前期的药物使用:关键预测因素与校本毒品教育
J Adolesc Health. 1997 May;20(5):384-95. doi: 10.1016/S1054-139X(96)00181-4.
4
Perceived ease of access to alcohol, tobacco and other substances in rural and urban US students.美国城乡学生对酒精、烟草及其他物质的易获取感知情况。
Rural Remote Health. 2015 Oct-Dec;15(4):3397. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
5
Drug prevention programmes for young people: where have we been and where should we be going?青少年毒品预防计划:我们已经走到哪里,应该走向何方?
Addiction. 2010 Oct;105(10):1688-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02790.x.
6
[Cigarette, alcohol and drug use in 12 to 13-year-old adolescents--an anonymous survey of 2,979 students].12至13岁青少年的吸烟、饮酒及药物使用情况——对2979名学生的匿名调查
Gesundheitswesen. 1995 Jun;57(6):339-44.
7
Health-compromising behaviors: why do adolescents smoke or drink?: identifying underlying risk and protective factors.危害健康的行为:青少年为何吸烟或饮酒?:识别潜在风险和保护因素。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 Oct;154(10):1025-33. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.154.10.1025.
8
The relationship between Australian harm minimisation alcohol education and student uptake, consumption and harm.澳大利亚减少伤害型酒精教育与学生参与度、饮酒量和伤害之间的关系。
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Feb;52:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.11.023. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
9
[Consumption of tobacco, alcohol and drugs among adolescents in Germany. Results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS)].[德国青少年的烟草、酒精和药物消费情况。德国儿童和青少年健康访谈与检查调查(KiGGS)的结果]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2007 May-Jun;50(5-6):600-8. doi: 10.1007/s00103-007-0221-y.
10
[Study about the associated use of different types of drugs by high school students].[关于高中生不同类型药物联合使用的研究]
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2011 Jul-Sep;115(3):919-26.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent smoking for girls.预防女孩吸烟的校内干预措施的系统评价
Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 14;4:109. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0082-7.
2
In defense of the randomized controlled trial for health promotion research.为健康促进研究中的随机对照试验辩护。
Am J Public Health. 2006 Jul;96(7):1181-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.061713. Epub 2006 May 30.