Carlson J W, Nazarian G K, Hartenbach E, Carter J R, Dusenbery K E, Fowler J M, Hunter D W, Adcock L L, Twiggs L B, Carson L F
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Minnesota Hospital and Clinic, Minneapolis 55455, USA.
Gynecol Oncol. 1995 Mar;56(3):362-9. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1995.1064.
Patients with gynecologic malignancies may develop stenosis of the large pelvic veins as a result of their disease or its treatment. The percutaneous insertion of a stainless steel vascular stent is a novel approach to the management of an extrinsically compressed vein. The objective of this study was to review the results of treating lower extremity edema secondary to a pelvic venous stenosis through the percutaneous insertion of a stainless steel vascular stent. A retrospective review was performed on gynecologic oncology patients who presented with an edematous lower extremity and underwent an evaluation to diagnose proximal venous stenosis. The evaluation included sonography, venography, and balloon angioplasty prior to the percutaneous insertion of a stainless steel vascular stent. If a venous thrombosis was documented, thrombolysis with urokinase was performed prior to evaluation for venous stenosis. Records were reviewed for the etiology of the venous stenosis, the location and type of stent inserted, and the ability of the stent to maintain patency and provide symptomatic relief. Patency was evaluated at 1-week and then at 1-, 3-, and 6-month intervals. The probability of vascular stent patency was calculated using life table analysis. Ten patients with cervical (n = 4), corpus (n = 3), ovarian (n = 1), vulvar (n = 1), and vaginal (n = 1) cancer had one or more vascular stents inserted for the treatment of a stenosed pelvic vein. The etiologies of venous stenosis were radiation fibrosis and surgery (n = 5), postoperative fibrosis (n = 3), and metastatic tumor (n = 2). The stented vessels were the left common (n = 5) or left external (n = 4) iliac veins, the right common (n = 1) or right external (n = 3) iliac veins, and the right common femoral vein (n = 1). The median follow-up was 21 months. All patients had subjective resolution of their edematous extremity while the stents were patent. The interval probability of patency of stented veins was greater than 85% at each evaluation interval. Patency was 100% for patients beyond 6 months of follow-up. There were no major complications. The percutaneous intravascular insertion of a stainless steel stent was safe and subjectively effective in the management of venous stenosis associated with a gynecologic cancer. A prospective trial with objective endpoints may be warranted.
妇科恶性肿瘤患者可能因其疾病或治疗而发生大盆腔静脉狭窄。经皮插入不锈钢血管支架是一种治疗外部受压静脉的新方法。本研究的目的是回顾经皮插入不锈钢血管支架治疗盆腔静脉狭窄继发下肢水肿的结果。对出现下肢水肿并接受评估以诊断近端静脉狭窄的妇科肿瘤患者进行了回顾性研究。评估包括在经皮插入不锈钢血管支架之前进行超声检查、静脉造影和球囊血管成形术。如果记录到静脉血栓形成,则在评估静脉狭窄之前用尿激酶进行溶栓治疗。审查记录以了解静脉狭窄的病因、插入支架的位置和类型,以及支架维持通畅和缓解症状的能力。在1周时评估通畅情况,然后在1个月、3个月和6个月时进行评估。使用生命表分析计算血管支架通畅的概率。10例宫颈癌(n = 4)、宫体癌(n = 3)、卵巢癌(n = 1)、外阴癌(n = 1)和阴道癌(n = 1)患者插入了一个或多个血管支架以治疗狭窄的盆腔静脉。静脉狭窄的病因是放射性纤维化和手术(n = 5)、术后纤维化(n = 3)和转移性肿瘤(n = 2)。置入支架的血管为左总静脉(n = 5)或左外静脉(n = 4)、右总静脉(n = 1)或右外静脉(n = 3)以及右股总静脉(n = 1)。中位随访时间为21个月。所有患者在支架通畅期间下肢水肿均有主观缓解。在每个评估间隔,置入支架静脉的通畅间隔概率均大于85%。随访超过6个月的患者通畅率为100%。无重大并发症。经皮血管内插入不锈钢支架在治疗与妇科癌症相关的静脉狭窄方面是安全且主观有效的。可能有必要进行一项具有客观终点的前瞻性试验。