• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢西丁、头孢替坦及氨苄西林与舒巴坦联合用药对小鼠多菌感染治疗效果的比较

Comparison of cefoxitin, cefotetan and the combination of ampicillin with sulbactam in the therapy of polymicrobial infection in mice.

作者信息

Brook I

机构信息

Naval Medical Research Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20813-0412.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994 Nov;34(5):791-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/34.5.791.

DOI:10.1093/jac/34.5.791
PMID:7706175
Abstract

The comparative efficacies of cefoxitin, cefotetan and the combination of ampicillin with sulbactam were investigated in mixed aerobic and anaerobic infections of mice. Treatment was administered by intramuscular injection for 10 days and was started 1 h before infection. After intraperitoneal infection with Escherichia coli, Bacteroides fragilis, and one other member of the B. fragilis group (either Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, Bacteroides ovatus or Bacteroides distasonis), 41 of 90 (46%) control mice died and all survivors developed polymicrobial abscesses. Cephalosporin therapy reduced mortaligy 13% with cefoxitin, 3% with cefotetan, and 23% with ampicillin plus sulbactam; 14%, 10% and 14% of surviving animals, respectively developed abscesses. Each of the treatment regimens significantly reduced the number of all organisms in abscesses, independent of their activity in vitro. However, the reduction in the number of E. coli by ampicillin plus sulbactam was less marked (P < 0.001) than that achieved by cefoxitin (P < 0.05) or cefotetan. These data show that in vivo efficiencies of cefoxitin and cefotetan, are independent of their in vitro potencies in the early management of polymicrobial infections in mice.

摘要

在小鼠需氧菌与厌氧菌混合感染中,研究了头孢西丁、头孢替坦以及氨苄西林与舒巴坦联合用药的相对疗效。治疗通过肌肉注射给药,持续10天,在感染前1小时开始。腹腔注射大肠杆菌、脆弱拟杆菌以及脆弱拟杆菌属的另一种菌(要么是多形拟杆菌、卵形拟杆菌,要么是狄氏拟杆菌)后,90只对照小鼠中有41只(46%)死亡,所有存活小鼠均形成了多种微生物脓肿。头孢菌素治疗使死亡率降低,头孢西丁降低了13%,头孢替坦降低了3%,氨苄西林加舒巴坦降低了23%;存活动物中分别有14%、10%和14%形成了脓肿。每种治疗方案均显著减少了脓肿中所有微生物的数量,与它们的体外活性无关。然而,氨苄西林加舒巴坦对大肠杆菌数量的减少不如头孢西丁(P < 0.05)或头孢替坦显著(P < 0.001)。这些数据表明,在小鼠多种微生物感染的早期治疗中,头孢西丁和头孢替坦的体内疗效与其体外效力无关。

相似文献

1
Comparison of cefoxitin, cefotetan and the combination of ampicillin with sulbactam in the therapy of polymicrobial infection in mice.头孢西丁、头孢替坦及氨苄西林与舒巴坦联合用药对小鼠多菌感染治疗效果的比较
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1994 Nov;34(5):791-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/34.5.791.
2
In vitro susceptibility and in vivo efficacy of antimicrobials in the treatment of Bacteroides fragilis-Escherichia coli infection in mice.抗菌药物对小鼠脆弱拟杆菌-大肠杆菌感染的体外敏感性及体内疗效
J Infect Dis. 1989 Oct;160(4):651-6. doi: 10.1093/infdis/160.4.651.
3
Comparison of cefoxitin, cefotetan, and ampicillin/sulbactam as prophylaxis for polymicrobial infection in mice.头孢西丁、头孢替坦和氨苄西林/舒巴坦作为小鼠多微生物感染预防药物的比较。
Clin Infect Dis. 1995 Jun;20 Suppl 2:S376-7. doi: 10.1093/clinids/20.supplement_2.s376.
4
Use of cephalosporins for prophylaxis and therapy of polymicrobial infection in mice.头孢菌素在小鼠多微生物感染预防和治疗中的应用。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Jul;37(7):1531-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.7.1531.
5
Ampicillin/sulbactam and cefoxitin in the treatment of cutaneous and other soft-tissue abscesses in patients with or without histories of injection drug abuse.
Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Aug;31(2):464-71. doi: 10.1086/313971. Epub 2000 Sep 14.
6
In-vitro susceptibility and in-vivo efficacy of antimicrobials in the treatment of intraabdominal sepsis in mice.抗菌药物治疗小鼠腹腔内脓毒症的体外敏感性和体内疗效
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Mar;31(3):393-401. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.3.393.
7
Sulbactam/ampicillin versus cefotetan in the treatment of obstetric and gynecologic infections.舒巴坦/氨苄西林与头孢替坦治疗妇产科感染的对比研究
Suppl Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1989;2:21-7. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(89)90088-x.
8
Prophylaxis of and therapy for polymicrobial infection in mice with cefoxitin, cefotetan, and cefmetazole.用头孢西丁、头孢替坦和头孢美唑对小鼠进行多微生物感染的预防和治疗
Clin Infect Dis. 1993 Jun;16 Suppl 4:S425-6. doi: 10.1093/clinids/16.supplement_4.s425.
9
Risk factors leading to clinical failure in the treatment of intra-abdominal or skin/soft tissue infections.导致腹腔内或皮肤/软组织感染治疗临床失败的危险因素。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996 Dec;15(12):913-21. doi: 10.1007/BF01690508.
10
Serum and blister fluid pharmacokinetics and bactericidal activities of ampicillin-sulbactam, cefotetan, cefoxitin, ceftizoxime, and ticarcillin-clavulanate.氨苄西林-舒巴坦、头孢替坦、头孢西丁、头孢唑肟和替卡西林-克拉维酸的血清及水疱液药代动力学和杀菌活性
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Oct;36(10):2233-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.36.10.2233.

引用本文的文献

1
Highly Sensitive In Vivo Imaging of Bacterial Infections with a Hydrophilicity-Switching, Self-Immobilizing, Near-Infrared Fluorogenic β-Lactamase Probe Enriched within Bacteria.利用一种亲水性切换、自固定、富集于细菌内的近红外荧光β-内酰胺酶探针进行细菌感染的高灵敏度体内成像。
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2025 Feb;12(5):e2408559. doi: 10.1002/advs.202408559. Epub 2024 Dec 12.