Suppr超能文献

[表达性词汇:幼儿园儿童两种心理测试程序的比较]

[Expressive vocabulary: comparison of 2 psychological test procedures in kindergarten children].

作者信息

Kiese-Himmel C, Kruse E

机构信息

Abteilung Phoniatrie/Pädaudiologie, George-August-Universität Göttingen.

出版信息

Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 1995 Feb;44(2):44-7.

PMID:7708632
Abstract

Fifty-five subjects were drawn from a population of average kindergarden children. Their ages ranged between 3; 4 and 4; 11 years. Two vocabulary tests were administered individually in a quiet room to each subject. A new instrument for testing the active vocabulary (Subtest "vocabulary" of the K-ABC, 1991) was compared with an established one (AWST 3-6, 1979) to see whether they agree sufficiently for the new to replace the old. Raw scores were computed according to the test instructions for each correct response and transformed into normscores. These were compared, and both tests correlated with r = 0.69 (p = 0.0001). So, the K-ABC-Subtest "vocabulary" may be administered in the first diagnostic setting. The mean of the differences of both vocabulary tests is 0.1; yet, in some cases large differences between the results of both vocabulary tests are to be expected, because the differences vary in the broad range from -15.5 to +15.7 (= +/- 2 SD). Therefore the more detailed AWST 3-6 should be used to assess the amount of active vocabulary in children with a low norm score in the K-ABC-Subtest "vocabulary".

摘要

55名受试者来自普通幼儿园儿童群体。他们的年龄在3岁4个月至4岁11个月之间。在一个安静的房间里,对每位受试者单独进行两项词汇测试。将一种新的测试主动词汇的工具(1991年K-ABC的“词汇”子测试)与一种已有的工具(1979年的AWST 3-6)进行比较,以确定它们是否足够一致,从而使新工具能够取代旧工具。根据测试说明,对每个正确回答计算原始分数,并将其转换为标准分数。对这些分数进行比较,两种测试的相关性为r = 0.69(p = 0.0001)。因此,K-ABC的“词汇”子测试可用于首次诊断。两种词汇测试结果差异的平均值为0.1;然而,在某些情况下,预计两种词汇测试结果会有较大差异,因为差异范围很广,从-15.5到+15.7(=±2标准差)。因此,对于在K-ABC“词汇”子测试中标准分数较低的儿童,应使用更详细的AWST 3-6来评估其主动词汇量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验