Childers J S, Durham T W, Wilson S
Psychology Department, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858.
Percept Mot Skills. 1994 Dec;79(3 Pt 1):1195-9. doi: 10.2466/pms.1994.79.3.1195.
58 children enrolled in a university preschool or kindergarten program were administered the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT) and the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test--Revised (PPVT--R). The PPVT--R correlated .75 with the K-BIT composite IQ, .69 with the K-BIT Vocabulary standard score, and .57 with the K-BIT Matrices score. The instruments also showed significant agreement (83%) in classifying children into average versus above average categories based upon a 110 standard score on either instrument. Analysis of K-BIT Vocabulary-Matrices differences showed a mean difference of 6 points favoring Vocabulary. Differences ranged from -32 points to 43 points. 64% of the subjects scored higher on the Vocabulary than on the Matrices subtest of the K-BIT. 48% of the sample showed differences between scores on Vocabulary and Matrices of 10 points or more disregarding the direction of the difference. Implications for the concurrent validity of the instrument and interpretation of subscale differences for preschool children were discussed.
58名就读于大学学前班或幼儿园项目的儿童接受了考夫曼简易智力测验(K-BIT)和皮博迪图片词汇测验修订版(PPVT-R)。PPVT-R与K-BIT综合智商的相关系数为0.75,与K-BIT词汇标准分数的相关系数为0.69,与K-BIT矩阵分数的相关系数为0.57。在根据任一测验110的标准分数将儿童分为平均水平和高于平均水平类别方面,这两种测验也显示出显著的一致性(83%)。对K-BIT词汇-矩阵差异的分析表明,平均差异为6分,词汇部分占优。差异范围为-32分至43分。64%的受试者在K-BIT词汇子测验中的得分高于矩阵子测验。48%的样本在词汇和矩阵分数上的差异达到或超过10分,不考虑差异方向。文中讨论了该测验的同时效度以及对学龄前儿童分量表差异解释的意义。