Long A, Michod R E
Program in Applied Mathematics, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721.
Theor Popul Biol. 1995 Feb;47(1):18-55. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1995.1002.
Genetic damage is a fundamental problem for living systems. Recombination can repair a damaged gene, so long as there is an undamaged copy of the gene available in the cell. This requires that the cell be diploid for the damaged locus. During sex, outcrossing generates the diploid state by temporarily fusing two haploid cells (as in the case of meiosis) or by bringing DNA into the cell from outside (as in the case of bacterial transformation). But why should cells alternate between the haploid and diploid states in the first place? Why not just remain diploid, if damage repair is the only problem for a cell? The goal of our work is to understand if the problem of genetic damage would select for diploidy or for the alternation between diploid and haploid states--that is, sex--early in the history of life. Using mathematical models we study competition between asexual haploids (termed "haploids"), sexuals (termed "sexuals"), and asexual diploids (termed "diploids"). Haploid cells are efficient replicators, while diploid cells are resistant to damage. A sexual may combine the advantages of both: spending much of its life cycle in the haploid state, then temporarily fusing to become diploid, followed by splitting to the haploid state. During the diploid state DNA damage can be repaired, since there are two copies of the gene in the cell and one copy is presumed to be undamaged. We describe the competition in terms of mathematical models, employing five rate parameters which represent the life processes of cells most probably active at the time that sexuality arose: birth and death; genomic damage (for the haploids alone); and, for the sexual cell, fusion and splitting. Parameter space bifurcation diagrams for the equilibria are drawn in the three-dimensional space of damage, splitting, and fusion, and solutions of the equations (i.e., the outcomes of the competition) are described in terms of them. It turns out that those three parameters suffice to give an essentially complete description of the qualitative behavior possible, since one parameter can be scaled out of the equations we ultimately consider, and the other permits generic analysis, for the range of parameter values of interest, at a fixed value of that parameter. Each type of cell has a region of the parameter space that it occupies exclusively (given its initial presence in the competition). The haploid can win only in environments characterized by low damage (relative to mortality), while the diploid can win only in environments characterized by high damage (relative to mortality).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
基因损伤是生命系统面临的一个基本问题。重组能够修复受损基因,只要细胞中有该基因的未受损拷贝即可。这要求细胞在受损位点上是二倍体。在有性生殖过程中,异交通过暂时融合两个单倍体细胞(如减数分裂的情况)或从外部将DNA导入细胞(如细菌转化的情况)来产生二倍体状态。但细胞为何首先要在单倍体和二倍体状态之间交替呢?如果损伤修复是细胞面临的唯一问题,为何不一直保持二倍体状态呢?我们研究的目标是了解在生命早期,基因损伤问题是否会促使细胞选择二倍体状态,或者选择在二倍体和单倍体状态之间交替——也就是有性生殖。我们使用数学模型来研究无性单倍体(称为“单倍体”)、有性生殖细胞(称为“有性生殖细胞”)和无性二倍体(称为“二倍体”)之间的竞争。单倍体细胞是高效的复制者,而二倍体细胞对损伤具有抗性。有性生殖细胞可能兼具两者的优势:在其生命周期的大部分时间处于单倍体状态,然后暂时融合成为二倍体,接着再分裂回到单倍体状态。在二倍体状态下,DNA损伤能够得到修复,因为细胞中有该基因的两个拷贝,且假定其中一个拷贝未受损。我们用数学模型来描述这种竞争,采用五个速率参数,它们代表了在有性生殖出现时最可能活跃的细胞生命过程:出生和死亡;基因组损伤(仅针对单倍体);以及对于有性生殖细胞而言的融合和分裂。在损伤、分裂和融合的三维空间中绘制平衡点的参数空间分岔图,并据此描述方程的解(即竞争的结果)。结果表明,这三个参数足以对可能的定性行为给出基本完整的描述,因为在我们最终考虑的方程中,一个参数可以被消去,而另一个参数在感兴趣的参数值范围内,在其固定值时允许进行一般分析。每种类型的细胞在参数空间中都有一个它独占的区域(给定其在竞争中的初始存在情况)。单倍体只有在损伤程度较低(相对于死亡率)的环境中才能获胜,而二倍体只有在损伤程度较高(相对于死亡率)的环境中才能获胜。