• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

走向真实的对话。医患关系中的真实性。

Towards authentic conversations. Authenticity in the patient-professional relationship.

作者信息

Arnason V

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, University of Iceland, Reykjavík.

出版信息

Theor Med. 1994;15(3):227-42. doi: 10.1007/BF01313339.

DOI:10.1007/BF01313339
PMID:7709371
Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the significance of the existential notion of authenticity for medical ethics. This is done by analyzing authenticity and examining its implications for the patient-professional relationship and for ethical decision-making in medical situations. It is argued that while authenticity implies important demand for individual responsibility, which has therapeutic significance, it perpetuates ideas which are antithetical both to authentic interaction between patients and professionals and to fruitful deliberation of moral dilemmas. In order to counteract these consequences, an alternative idea of authenticity is introduced. According to this idea, authenticity is not regarded primarily as individual sovereignty, but as an ability to participate in a dialogue in which the subjectivity of both partners is respected. Such practice, based on mutual trust and responsibility, would enhance common decision-making and overcome the alienation between patients and professionals.

摘要

本文旨在评估本真这一存在主义概念对医学伦理学的重要性。这是通过分析本真并审视其对医患关系以及医疗情境中伦理决策的影响来实现的。有人认为,虽然本真意味着对个人责任的重要要求,这具有治疗意义,但它延续了与医患之间真实互动以及道德困境的有效思考相对立的观念。为了抵消这些后果,引入了一种替代性的本真观念。根据这一观念,本真主要不被视为个人主权,而是被视为一种参与对话的能力,在这种对话中,双方的主体性都得到尊重。这种基于相互信任和责任的实践将加强共同决策,并克服医患之间的疏离。

相似文献

1
Towards authentic conversations. Authenticity in the patient-professional relationship.走向真实的对话。医患关系中的真实性。
Theor Med. 1994;15(3):227-42. doi: 10.1007/BF01313339.
2
Authenticity as a foundational principle of medical ethics.真实性作为医学伦理的一项基本原则。
Theor Med. 1994;15(3):211-25. doi: 10.1007/BF01313338.
3
Gadamerian dialogue in the patient-professional interaction.患者与专业人员互动中的伽达默尔式对话。
Med Health Care Philos. 2000;3(1):17-23. doi: 10.1023/a:1009908132170.
4
Existential autonomy: why patients should make their own choices.生存自主性:为何患者应自行做出选择。
J Med Ethics. 1997 Aug;23(4):221-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.23.4.221.
5
The changing doctor-patient relationship and the new medical ethics.不断变化的医患关系与新的医学伦理学
SA J Contin Med Educ. 1987 Apr;5(4):27, 29, 32-34.
6
The conflict between autonomy and beneficence in medical ethics: proposal for a resolution.医学伦理学中自主性与行善原则之间的冲突:一种解决方案的提议。
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1987 Spring;3:23-46.
7
Patient autonomy in decision making: recent trends in medical ethics.
Linacre Q. 1986 May;53(2):37-46. doi: 10.1080/00243639.1986.11877848.
8
The friendship model of physician/patient relationship and patient autonomy.医患关系的友谊模式与患者自主性。
Bioethics. 1988 Jan;2(1):23-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1988.tb00033.x.
9
Physician-patient encounters "on a darkling plain.医患会面“在一片昏暗的平原上” 。 (此句单独看表意不太完整,可能在具体语境中有更确切含义)
West New Engl Law Rev. 1987;9(1):207-26.
10
Four models of the physician-patient relationship.医患关系的四种模式。
JAMA. 1992;267(16):2221-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient, Caregiver, and Provider Perspectives on Improving Provider-Patient Interactions in Hemodialysis: A Qualitative Study.患者、护理人员及医护人员对改善血液透析中医护人员与患者互动的看法:一项定性研究
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2025 Jan 3;12:20543581241309986. doi: 10.1177/20543581241309986. eCollection 2025.
2
The Doctor as Parent, Partner, Provider… or Comrade? Distribution of Power in Past and Present Models of the Doctor-Patient Relationship.医生作为家长、伴侣、提供者……还是同志?过去和现在的医患关系模式中权力的分配。
Health Care Anal. 2021 Sep;29(3):231-248. doi: 10.1007/s10728-021-00432-2. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
3

本文引用的文献

1
(Almost) everything you ever wanted to know about informed consent. [Review of: Faden, RR and Beauchamp, TL. A history and theory of informed concsent. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986].(几乎)所有你想了解的关于知情同意的内容。[评:法登,RR和博尚,TL。《知情同意的历史与理论》。纽约和牛津:牛津大学出版社,1986年]
Med Humanit Rev. 1987 Jan;1(1):78-82.
2
The place of autonomy in bioethics.自主权在生物伦理学中的地位。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1990 Jan-Feb;20(1):12-7.
Obese patients overestimate physicians' attitudes of respect.
肥胖患者高估了医生的尊重态度。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Jul;88(1):23-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.12.010. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
4
Bioethical concepts in theory and practice: an exploratory study of prenatal screening in Iceland.理论与实践中的生物伦理概念:冰岛产前筛查的探索性研究。
Med Health Care Philos. 2011 Feb;14(1):53-61. doi: 10.1007/s11019-010-9291-y.
5
Professional autonomy and the normative structure of medical practice.专业自主性与医疗实践的规范结构。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2000;21(5):457-75. doi: 10.1023/a:1009925423036.
6
Gadamerian dialogue in the patient-professional interaction.患者与专业人员互动中的伽达默尔式对话。
Med Health Care Philos. 2000;3(1):17-23. doi: 10.1023/a:1009908132170.
7
Experience or authority? A response to Widdershoven.
Med Health Care Philos. 2000;3(2):191-3. doi: 10.1023/a:1009908406435.
8
Tell me what's wrong with me: a discourse analysis approach to the concept of patient autonomy.告诉我我怎么了:一种关于患者自主性概念的话语分析方法。
J Med Ethics. 1998 Dec;24(6):394-400. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.6.394.