Vreven D L, Gudanowski D M, King L A, King D W
Department of Psychology, Central Michigan University, Mt. Pleasant 48859.
J Trauma Stress. 1995 Jan;8(1):91-109. doi: 10.1007/BF02105409.
This three-part study examined the reliability and validity of the civilian version of the Mississippi Scale for Combat-Related PTSD using data from the nonveteran participants in the National Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Study. The Civilian Mississippi Scale had a raw score distribution that was roughly symmetric, with an acceptable degree of dispersion and a reasonably high internal consistency reliability coefficient. Overall, however, measurement precision was weaker than that for the military version of the instrument, and confirmatory factor analytic findings differed from those found for the military version. Preliminary investigations of validity were in the form of correlations with indices of stressful life events, a PTSD symptom count, and measures of demoralization and active expression of hostility. The Civilian Mississippi Scale emerged from the various analyses as a PTSD measure with potential but requiring further validational study and perhaps some refinement.
这项分为三个部分的研究,利用越南退伍军人重新适应研究中来自非退伍军人参与者的数据,检验了民用版与战斗相关创伤后应激障碍的密西西比量表的信度和效度。民用密西西比量表的原始分数分布大致对称,具有可接受的离散程度和相当高的内部一致性信度系数。然而,总体而言,测量精度比该量表的军事版本要弱,验证性因素分析的结果也与军事版本不同。效度的初步调查采用与应激性生活事件指标、创伤后应激障碍症状计数以及士气低落和敌意主动表达测量指标的相关性形式。经过各种分析,民用密西西比量表作为一种有潜力的创伤后应激障碍测量工具出现,但需要进一步的效度研究,或许还需要一些改进。