University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
RAND, Arlington, VA, USA.
Subst Use Misuse. 2023;58(4):551-559. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2023.2177960. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
Prominent theories suggest that individuals with co-occurring traumatic stress symptoms (TSS) and substance use (SU) may be less responsive to SU treatment compared to those with SU only. However, empirical findings in adult samples are mixed, and there has been limited work among adolescents. This study assesses the association between TSS and SU treatment outcomes among trauma-exposed adolescents, using statistical methods to reduce potential confounding from important factors such as baseline SU severity. 2,963 adolescents with lifetime history of victimization received evidence-based SU treatment in outpatient community settings. At baseline, 3- and 6-months, youth were assessed using the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs Traumatic Stress Scale and the Substance Frequency Scale. Propensity score weighting was used to mitigate potential confounding due to baseline differences in sociodemographic characteristics and SU across youth with varying levels of TSS. Propensity score weighting successfully balanced baseline differences in sociodemographic factors and baseline SU across youth. Among all youth, mean SU was lower at both 3- and 6- month follow-up relative to baseline, indicating declining use. After adjusting for potential confounders, we observed no statistically significant relationship between TSS and SU at either 3- or 6-month follow-up. Based on this investigation, conducted among a large sample of trauma-exposed youth receiving evidence-based outpatient SU treatment, baseline TSS do not appear to be negatively associated with SU treatment outcomes. However, future research should examine whether youth with TSS achieve better outcomes through integrative treatment for both SU and TSS.
突出的理论表明,同时存在创伤后应激症状(TSS)和物质使用(SU)的个体与仅存在 SU 的个体相比,对 SU 治疗的反应可能较差。然而,成人样本中的实证结果喜忧参半,青少年群体中的研究工作有限。本研究使用统计方法评估了创伤后青少年 TSS 与 SU 治疗结果之间的关联,以减少基线 SU 严重程度等重要因素的潜在混杂。
2963 名有创伤后生活史的青少年在社区门诊环境中接受基于证据的 SU 治疗。在基线、3 个月和 6 个月时,使用全球个体需求评估创伤后应激量表和物质频率量表对青少年进行评估。采用倾向评分加权法减轻了由于 TSS 程度不同的青少年在社会人口统计学特征和 SU 方面的基线差异所导致的潜在混杂。
倾向评分加权成功地平衡了所有青少年在社会人口统计学因素和基线 SU 方面的基线差异。在所有青少年中,与基线相比,3 个月和 6 个月随访时的平均 SU 均较低,表明使用量下降。在调整了潜在混杂因素后,我们在 3 个月和 6 个月随访时均未观察到 TSS 与 SU 之间存在统计学上显著的关系。
基于这项在接受基于证据的门诊 SU 治疗的大量创伤后青少年中进行的调查,基线 TSS 似乎与 SU 治疗结果没有负相关。然而,未来的研究应检验 TSS 青少年是否通过同时治疗 SU 和 TSS 获得更好的结果。