Osterman J W
CMAJ. 1995 Apr 1;152(7):1051-5.
Universal precautions have gained wide acceptance in the literature and are promoted by major health care regulatory bodies as a measure to prevent nosocomial transmission of bloodborne diseases. Nevertheless, Dr. James G. Wright and associates (see pages 1089 to 1095 of this issue) provide evidence of the infrequent use of universal precautions by surgeons in Toronto. Their findings are consistent with those of similar studies and point to the limitations of any safety approach that relies on the active compliance of individuals rather than on passive, environmental controls. Successful approaches to optimizing workplace safety should first emphasize passive measures for risk abatement, including firm policies, the use of safer equipment and techniques, procedural safeguards and regular monitoring. Routine voluntary screening of patients undergoing procedures that pose a high risk of contamination may improve compliance to safety procedures by health care personnel. Further study is required.
通用预防措施在文献中已得到广泛认可,并被主要的医疗保健监管机构作为预防医院内血源性疾病传播的一项措施加以推广。然而,詹姆斯·G·赖特博士及其同事(见本期第1089至1095页)提供了证据,表明多伦多的外科医生很少使用通用预防措施。他们的研究结果与类似研究的结果一致,指出了任何依赖个人主动遵守而非被动环境控制的安全方法的局限性。优化工作场所安全的成功方法应首先强调降低风险的被动措施,包括严格的政策、使用更安全的设备和技术、程序保障措施以及定期监测。对接受有高污染风险手术的患者进行常规自愿筛查,可能会提高医护人员对安全程序的遵守程度。还需要进一步研究。