Zucker A R, Meadow W L
Section of Pediatric Critical Care, Wyler Children's Hospital, University of Chicago, IL., USA.
Crit Care Med. 1995 Apr;23(4):767-72. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199504000-00028.
To determine the attitude of pediatric critical care physicians concerning the use of ribavirin in children with respiratory syncytial virus lung disease in light of the revised American Academy of Pediatrics practice guidelines.
A questionnaire was sent to 145 pediatric critical care doctors in the United States.
Seventy-seven percent of questionnaires were returned. The vast majority (91%) of the respondents think that the available literature does not support the Academy's recommendations for the administration of ribavirin to critically ill children with respiratory syncytial virus pneumonia. The largest single group of respondents (42%) does not usually prescribe ribavirin for these patients, but may be persuaded to use it by colleagues or consultants in individual cases. Twenty-six percent of all respondents stated that they do not use ribavirin at any time, even in severely ill patients with documented infection. Twenty-two percent of the respondents say that they will prescribe ribavirin, not because they believe it is efficacious, but because they believe the Academy guidelines compel them to do so as a standard of care. The respondents reported adverse effects of the drug, most notably exacerbations of bronchospasm (92%), far more often than the Academy document asserts. When solicited for general comments, the respondents were frequently concerned that critical care physicians were not involved in the development of the guidelines, the guidelines were based on a paucity of reliable data, and that the guidelines could put them at risk of malpractice litigation should they choose to not use ribavirin.
Practice guidelines are increasingly being incorporated into patient care and quality improvement regimens, and it is imperative both that appropriate experts be included in their development, and that they be based on valid scientific data. The pediatric critical care community currently treats most of the severely ill patients with respiratory syncytial virus pneumonia. As a group, they remain unconvinced about the efficacy and safety of this drug, and many pediatricians are concerned about the ramifications of individualizing ribavirin therapy in their patients in light of the revised Academy recommendations.
根据美国儿科学会修订后的实践指南,确定儿科重症监护医生对利巴韦林用于呼吸道合胞病毒肺病患儿的态度。
向美国145名儿科重症监护医生发送了调查问卷。
77%的问卷被收回。绝大多数(91%)受访者认为现有文献不支持学会关于给患有呼吸道合胞病毒肺炎的重症患儿使用利巴韦林的建议。最大的单一受访者群体(42%)通常不给这些患者开利巴韦林,但在个别情况下可能会被同事或顾问说服使用。所有受访者中有26%表示他们在任何时候都不使用利巴韦林,即使是在有记录感染的重症患者中。22%的受访者表示他们会开利巴韦林,并非因为他们认为其有效,而是因为他们认为学会指南迫使他们将其作为一种治疗标准来使用。受访者报告了该药物的不良反应,最显著的是支气管痉挛加重(92%),远比学会文件声称的更频繁。当征求总体意见时,受访者经常担心重症监护医生没有参与指南的制定,指南基于的数据不足,并且如果他们选择不使用利巴韦林,这些指南可能会使他们面临医疗事故诉讼的风险。
实践指南越来越多地被纳入患者护理和质量改进方案中,必须让合适的专家参与其制定,并且指南要基于有效的科学数据。儿科重症监护领域目前治疗大多数患有呼吸道合胞病毒肺炎的重症患者。总体而言,他们仍然不相信这种药物的疗效和安全性,并且许多儿科医生担心根据学会修订后的建议对患者进行利巴韦林个体化治疗的后果。