Jordan-Moore J F
Int J Psychoanal. 1994 Dec;75 ( Pt 5-6):1251-66.
This paper starts by stating that in science there are no facts independent of theory. In psychoanalysis, the theory of the decisive importance of the unconscious makes it possible to grasp clinical facts. This leads to the centrality of transference in analysis. The latter is understood as a social fact. Transference, perceived as a private experience, can be known in the intimacy of the psychoanalytic relationship, through the communication by means of language, which is public. Psychoanalysis is then considered a science of intimacy. The analyst, in publishing clinical facts, faces the problem of the transposition of a fact from the intimacy sphere, considered as private, to the public sphere, and thus serves a scientific purpose. A treatment report is presented to illustrate the problems of the registering, editing and publishing of clinical facts, based on the parallel between making conscious that which is unconscious and making potentially public what is private. Thus the analyst confronts similar difficulties and anxieties, when publishing clinical facts, as the ones that the analysand must overcome to know, through the social experience of psychic intimacy, his or her private inner world.
本文开篇指出，在科学领域，不存在独立于理论的事实。在精神分析中，无意识具有决定性重要性的理论使得把握临床事实成为可能。这导致了移情在分析中的核心地位。后者被理解为一种社会事实。被视为个人体验的移情，可以在精神分析关系的亲密氛围中，通过作为公共媒介的语言交流来被认识。精神分析于是被视为一门关于亲密关系的科学。分析师在发表临床事实时，面临着将一个被视为私密的亲密领域的事实转换到公共领域的问题，从而服务于科学目的。本文呈现了一份治疗报告，基于使无意识的内容变得有意识与使私密的内容具有潜在公开性之间的平行关系，来说明临床事实的记录、编辑和发表问题。因此，分析师在发表临床事实时，面临着与分析对象通过精神亲密关系的社会体验来了解其私密内心世界时必须克服的类似困难和焦虑。
