Ornstein P H, Ornstein A
Int J Psychoanal. 1994 Dec;75 ( Pt 5-6):977-94.
After defining 'facts', 'clinical facts' and 'psychoanalytic clinical facts' the authors describe their conceptualisations of these facts from experience-near to experience-distant levels. They maintain that psychoanalytic clinical facts are jointly created by patient and analyst and are to a great degree dependent on the analyst's mode of observation and theory. They illustrate the various levels of conceptualisation within the broad outlines of self psychology with three detailed clinical vignettes from the analysis of Mr K. A starting central question in the authors' minds arises out of their focus on the patient's selfobject transference (in this instance a mirror transference), hence on the function they serve for the patient in this transference; the role he assigns to them in the restoration and maintenance of the cohesiveness of the self. It is the recognition of this function that serves as the basis for their conceptualisation of the patient's psychopathology as well as the curative process of his analysis.
在定义了“事实”“临床事实”和“精神分析临床事实”之后,作者们描述了他们从贴近经验到远离经验层面,对这些事实的概念化理解。他们认为,精神分析临床事实是由患者和分析师共同创造的,并且在很大程度上依赖于分析师的观察模式和理论。他们用对K先生分析中的三个详细临床案例,说明了自体心理学大致框架内概念化的不同层次。作者脑海中一个核心的起始问题,源于他们对患者自体客体移情(在这个案例中是镜像移情)的关注,因此也源于这种移情对患者所起的作用;患者在自体凝聚性的恢复和维持中赋予它们的角色。正是对这一功能的认识,成为了他们对患者精神病理学以及其分析治疗过程进行概念化的基础。