Fitten L J, Perryman K M, Wilkinson C J, Little R J, Burns M M, Pachana N, Mervis J R, Malmgren R, Siembieda D W, Ganzell S
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, UCLA School of Medicine, USA.
JAMA. 1995 May 3;273(17):1360-5.
To characterize on-the-road, behind-the-wheel driving abilities and related laboratory performances of subjects with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia.
Prospective, experimental study involving two mild dementia and three age and health control groups. Road test reliability and validity were assessed.
Greater western Los Angeles. Subjects were enrolled from the community by referral and from the Veterans Affairs dementia and diabetes clinics.
Eighty-seven driving subjects were enrolled; 83 completed the study. A sample of eligible dementia clinic subjects consisting of 15 mild AD patients met National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke-Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association probable AD criteria, while 12 met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Revised Third Edition and Hachinski diagnostic criteria for multi-infarct dementia (vascular dementia). Clinic control subjects consisted of 15 age-matched patients with diabetes and without a history of stroke or dementia. Community controls consisted of 26 healthy, age-matched, older subjects (> 60 years) and 16 young subjects (20 to 35 years).
Drive score from the Sepulveda (Calif) road test and laboratory measures of attention, perception, and memory.
The drive scores in the mild AD group (mean, 22.1; SD, 3.8) and in the vascular dementia group (mean, 24.0; SD, 7.8) differed significantly (P < .001 studentized range test) from the drive scores in the diabetic control group (mean, 31.5; SD, 3.9), the older control group (mean, 32.6; SD, 2.8), and the young control group (mean, 33.6; SD, 3.2). Drive score among the three control groups did not vary significantly. Short-term memory (Sternberg), visual tracking, and Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination scores correlated best with drive score, with a cumulative R2 of 0.68. Drive score and number of collisions and moving violations per 1000 miles driven were negatively correlated (r = -0.38; P < .02).
Based on this study, type and degree of cognitive impairment are better predictors of driving skills than age or medical diagnosis per se. Specific testing protocols for drivers with potential cognitive impairment may detect unsafe drivers more effectively than using age or medical diagnosis alone as criteria for license restriction or revocation.
描述轻度阿尔茨海默病(AD)和血管性痴呆患者的道路驾驶能力及相关实验室表现。
前瞻性实验研究,涉及两个轻度痴呆组和三个年龄及健康状况匹配的对照组。评估道路测试的可靠性和有效性。
洛杉矶西部。通过转诊从社区招募受试者,并从退伍军人事务部痴呆症和糖尿病诊所招募。
87名驾驶受试者入组;83名完成研究。符合条件的痴呆症诊所受试者样本包括15名轻度AD患者,符合美国国立神经疾病与中风研究所-阿尔茨海默病及相关疾病协会可能的AD标准,12名符合《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第三版修订版和哈金斯基多梗死性痴呆(血管性痴呆)诊断标准。诊所对照组由15名年龄匹配的糖尿病患者组成,无中风或痴呆病史。社区对照组由26名健康、年龄匹配的老年受试者(>60岁)和16名年轻受试者(20至35岁)组成。
来自加利福尼亚州塞普尔韦达道路测试的驾驶分数以及注意力、感知和记忆的实验室测量指标。
轻度AD组(均值22.1;标准差3.8)和血管性痴呆组(均值24.0;标准差7.8)的驾驶分数与糖尿病对照组(均值31.5;标准差3.9)、老年对照组(均值32.6;标准差2.8)和年轻对照组(均值33.6;标准差3.2)的驾驶分数存在显著差异(P <.001,学生化极差检验)。三个对照组之间的驾驶分数无显著差异。短期记忆(斯特恩伯格)、视觉追踪和福尔斯坦简易精神状态检查分数与驾驶分数的相关性最佳,累积R2为0.68。驾驶分数与每1000英里行驶的碰撞次数和交通违规次数呈负相关(r = -0.38;P <.02)。
基于本研究,认知障碍的类型和程度比年龄或医学诊断本身更能预测驾驶技能。针对潜在认知障碍驾驶员的特定测试方案可能比单独使用年龄或医学诊断作为驾照限制或吊销标准更有效地检测出不安全驾驶员。