• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[冠心病女性诊断与治疗中的性别偏见。综述]

[Gender bias in diagnosis and treatment of women with coronary heart disease. A review].

作者信息

Brezinka V

机构信息

Zentrum für Herz- und Lungenrehabilitation Rijnlands Zeehospitium.

出版信息

Z Kardiol. 1995 Feb;84(2):99-104.

PMID:7717024
Abstract

Recent studies collected via Medline and Psychlit suggest that coronary heart disease is treated less aggressively in women than in men. Women have significantly less access to major diagnostic and therapeutic procedures such as thrombolytic therapy, coronary angiography, coronary angioplasty, and coronary artery bypass surgery. This holds for women with suspected coronary heart disease as well as for women with coronary heart disease documented by myocardial infarction or coronary angiography. Possible reasons for gender bias in the management of coronary heart disease are: 1) physicians may underestimate the prevalence of coronary heart disease in women, 2) because of the higher prevalence in men, physicians may consider coronary heart disease as more serious in men, 3) a general lack of knowledge concerning coronary heart disease in women, 4) physicians' perceptions of gender-specific differences in risks and benefits of certain procedures, 5) gender stereotypes of the physician, 6) presentation style of the patient.

摘要

通过医学在线数据库(Medline)和心理学文摘数据库(Psychlit)收集的近期研究表明,与男性相比,女性冠心病的治疗不够积极。女性获得诸如溶栓治疗、冠状动脉造影、冠状动脉成形术和冠状动脉搭桥手术等主要诊断和治疗程序的机会明显更少。这在疑似冠心病的女性以及经心肌梗死或冠状动脉造影确诊为冠心病的女性中均成立。冠心病治疗中存在性别偏见的可能原因如下:1)医生可能低估了女性冠心病的患病率;2)由于男性患病率较高,医生可能认为男性的冠心病更为严重;3)普遍缺乏对女性冠心病的了解;4)医生对某些程序风险和益处的性别差异的认知;5)医生的性别刻板印象;6)患者的表现方式。

相似文献

1
[Gender bias in diagnosis and treatment of women with coronary heart disease. A review].[冠心病女性诊断与治疗中的性别偏见。综述]
Z Kardiol. 1995 Feb;84(2):99-104.
2
Coronary artery disease in older women.老年女性的冠状动脉疾病
Geriatrics. 1993 Jun;48 Suppl 1:4-8.
3
Gender differences in the outcome of cardiac interventions.心脏介入治疗结果中的性别差异。
Herz. 2005 Aug;30(5):375-89. doi: 10.1007/s00059-005-2716-3.
4
Physician knowledge levels and barriers to coronary risk prevention in women: survey results from the Women and Heart Disease Physician Education Initiative.医生对女性冠心病风险预防的认知水平及障碍:女性与心脏病医生教育倡议的调查结果
Womens Health Issues. 2007 Mar-Apr;17(2):93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2006.11.003.
5
Gender disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: large-scale observations from the CRUSADE (Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes With Early Implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines) National Quality Improvement Initiative.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征诊断与治疗中的性别差异:来自CRUSADE(不稳定型心绞痛患者快速风险分层能否通过早期实施美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会指南抑制不良结局)国家质量改进计划的大规模观察结果
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Mar 15;45(6):832-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.11.055.
6
Is there detrimental gender bias in preoperative cardiac management of patients undergoing vascular surgery?
Circulation. 1994 Nov;90(5 Pt 2):II220-3.
7
An update on coronary heart disease in women.
Int J Fertil Womens Med. 1998 Mar-Apr;43(2):84-90.
8
Heart disease in older women. Gender differences affect diagnosis and treatment.老年女性的心脏病。性别差异影响诊断和治疗。
Geriatrics. 2003 Dec;58(12):33-9; quiz 40.
9
No gender difference in the clinical management and outcome of unstable angina.不稳定型心绞痛的临床管理及预后不存在性别差异。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2005 Apr;7(4):228-32.
10
Heart disease in women.女性心脏病
Int J Fertil Womens Med. 2000 Nov-Dec;45(6):350-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Long non-coding RNA in coronary artery disease: the role of PDXDC1-AS1 and SFI1-AS1.长链非编码 RNA 在冠状动脉疾病中的作用:PDXDC1-AS1 和 SFI1-AS1 的作用。
Funct Integr Genomics. 2023 Jul 3;23(3):219. doi: 10.1007/s10142-023-01134-9.