Anttonen H, Puhakka K, Niskanen J, Ryhänen P
Oulu Regional Institute of Occupational Health, Finland.
Br J Anaesth. 1995 Mar;74(3):306-10. doi: 10.1093/bja/74.3.306.
We have measured non-evaporative, cutaneous heat loss using heat flux transducers at eight skin sites in five children during anaesthesia and compared the data with basal metabolic heat production. The effect of disposable surgical covering and a radiant heater on heat flux was examined. The mean total heat flow rate before draping was 3-9 W higher than the basal metabolic rate after induction of anaesthesia with a simultaneous decrease in rectal temperature. Mean cutaneous heat loss was 62 (SD 9) W m-2 (9.5 (2.1) kJ kg-1 h-1) in children older than 1 yr and 84 W m-2 (17.2 kJ kg-1 h-1) in a 3-month-old infant. Disposable drapes diminished cutaneous heat loss by 29% and a radian heater by 77%. Heat conduction to the mattress was 21 (7) W m-2. These results showed that the decrease in core temperature after induction of anaesthesia was genuine cooling, that is heat loss exceeded heat production.
我们使用热通量传感器在五名儿童麻醉期间的八个皮肤部位测量了非蒸发式皮肤热损失,并将数据与基础代谢产热进行了比较。研究了一次性手术覆盖物和辐射加热器对热通量的影响。铺巾前的平均总热流率比麻醉诱导后的基础代谢率高3 - 9瓦,同时直肠温度下降。1岁以上儿童的平均皮肤热损失为62(标准差9)瓦/平方米(9.5(2.1)千焦/千克·小时),一名3个月大的婴儿为84瓦/平方米(17.2千焦/千克·小时)。一次性手术巾使皮肤热损失减少了29%,辐射加热器使其减少了77%。向床垫的热传导为21(7)瓦/平方米。这些结果表明,麻醉诱导后核心温度的下降是真正的降温,即热损失超过了产热。