Suppr超能文献

利用组蛋白mRNA原位检测评估表皮增殖:与Ki67抗原和BrdU掺入法的比较

Use of in situ detection of histone mRNA in the assessment of epidermal proliferation: comparison with the Ki67 antigen and BrdU incorporation.

作者信息

Smith M D, Healy E, Thompson V, Morley A, Rees J L

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Royal Victoria Infirmary, U.K.

出版信息

Br J Dermatol. 1995 Mar;132(3):359-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1995.tb08668.x.

Abstract

The labelling index is commonly used as a measure of proliferation. However, the use of tritiated thymidine or BrdU labelling of S-phase cells is limited to prospective samples. We have employed an oligonucleotide cocktail complementary to the mRNA species encoding the replication-dependent histones H2B, H3 and H4 for non-isotopic in situ hybridization (NISH), and have compared the resultant proliferation indices in normal skin with those obtained by bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation and by Ki67 immunohistochemistry (IHC) using the monoclonal antibody MIB1. In addition, we compared the staining characteristics of histone NISH and Ki67 IHC in a further 25 samples from a variety of inflammatory dermatoses and neoplastic conditions, as well as from normal skin. In normal skin, S-phase (histone NISH and BrdU) and cycling (Ki67) cells were confined to the basal and low suprabasal layers. The labelling indices determined by histone NISH and BrdU incorporation were similar, whereas that of Ki67 IHC was four times greater. In biopsies from hyperproliferative dermatoses and dysplastic or malignant lesions, the number of histone NISH- and Ki67 IHC-positive cells was generally elevated; in accordance with the differential expression of these two markers during the cell cycle, MIB1 consistently gave higher results. The advantage of histone NISH over Ki67 IHC is that it is a marker of the same part of the cell cycle as BrdU incorporation. However, the combined use of both histone NISH and Ki67 IHC to measure two cell cycle parameters, namely S-phase and the number of cycling cells, allows more detailed retrospective study of epidermal proliferation than has been possible previously.

摘要

标记指数通常用作增殖的衡量指标。然而,用氚标记的胸腺嘧啶核苷或BrdU对S期细胞进行标记仅限于前瞻性样本。我们采用了一种与编码复制依赖性组蛋白H2B、H3和H4的mRNA物种互补的寡核苷酸混合物进行非同位素原位杂交(NISH),并将正常皮肤中所得的增殖指数与通过溴脱氧尿苷(BrdU)掺入以及使用单克隆抗体MIB1进行Ki67免疫组织化学(IHC)所获得的增殖指数进行了比较。此外,我们在另外25个来自各种炎症性皮肤病、肿瘤性疾病以及正常皮肤的样本中比较了组蛋白NISH和Ki67 IHC的染色特征。在正常皮肤中,S期(组蛋白NISH和BrdU)和循环(Ki67)细胞局限于基底层和基底层上方较低的层次。通过组蛋白NISH和BrdU掺入所确定的标记指数相似,而Ki67 IHC的标记指数则高出四倍。在增殖性皮肤病以及发育异常或恶性病变的活检样本中,组蛋白NISH和Ki67 IHC阳性细胞的数量通常会增加;根据这两种标记物在细胞周期中的差异表达,MIB1始终给出更高的结果。组蛋白NISH相对于Ki67 IHC的优势在于,它与BrdU掺入一样,是细胞周期同一部分的标记物。然而,联合使用组蛋白NISH和Ki67 IHC来测量两个细胞周期参数,即S期和循环细胞数量,能够比以往更详细地对表皮增殖进行回顾性研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验