Suppr超能文献

患有α波睡眠模式的失眠症患者的睡眠、其主观感受及日间表现。

Sleep, its subjective perception, and daytime performance in insomniacs with a pattern of alpha sleep.

作者信息

Schneider-Helmert D, Kumar A

机构信息

Pain Clinic Kirschgarten, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Biol Psychiatry. 1995 Jan 15;37(2):99-105. doi: 10.1016/0006-3223(94)00162-V.

Abstract

Intrusion of alpha activity, an electroencephalographic (EEG) pattern typical for wakefulness, into sleep stages has repeatedly been described and investigated in various populations. Some studies suggested that it is a less deep and restorative sleep, but others did not support this interpretation. The present study was carried out to collect ample data on neurophysiology and subjective experience of sleep and on daytime cognitive performance to clarify this point. A sample of 128 primary insomniacs was investigated with polysomnography (PSG) that was submitted to a computerized, automatic analysis of alpha activity during sleep. It yielded two groups of 64 Ss each with a normal, that is, nonalpha sleep EEG and with alpha-sleep, respectively. Contrasting the two groups for PSG showed that alpha sleep Ss had significantly more stage 4 and a (nonsignificant) tendency for more awakenings. Subjectively, they largely underestimated intermittent wake time and consequently overestimated sleep duration by 50 min. The performance test battery showed a difference in one test only, that is, a better short-term memory function by alpha sleep Ss. In conclusion, there was no result supporting the assumption that alpha sleep is less restorative, but a significant lack of perception of intermittent awakenings during night sleep by alpha sleep Ss was found. The authors propose an explanation and point to the implications this misperception might have for the clinician.

摘要

α波活动(一种清醒状态下典型的脑电图(EEG)模式)侵入睡眠阶段的情况已在不同人群中被反复描述和研究。一些研究表明,这是一种深度较浅且恢复性较差的睡眠,但其他研究并不支持这种解释。本研究旨在收集关于睡眠的神经生理学、主观体验以及白天认知表现的大量数据,以阐明这一问题。对128名原发性失眠患者进行了多导睡眠图(PSG)检查,并对睡眠期间的α波活动进行了计算机自动分析。结果产生了两组,每组64名受试者,分别具有正常的即非α波睡眠脑电图和α波睡眠脑电图。对两组进行PSG对比显示,α波睡眠组的受试者有更多的慢波睡眠4期,且觉醒次数有(不显著的)增多趋势。在主观方面,他们在很大程度上低估了间歇性觉醒时间,因此高估了睡眠时间达50分钟。成套性能测试仅在一项测试中显示出差异,即α波睡眠组的受试者短期记忆功能更好。总之,没有结果支持α波睡眠恢复性较差这一假设,但发现α波睡眠组的受试者在夜间睡眠期间明显缺乏对间歇性觉醒的感知。作者提出了一种解释,并指出了这种误解可能对临床医生产生的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验