• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Guide to identifying and correcting decision making errors in mental disability practice.

作者信息

Rabinowitz J

机构信息

Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.

出版信息

Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1994;22(4):561-75.

PMID:7718929
Abstract

Presented is a practical and theoretical guide to help practitioners identify and alleviate decision making errors. Common decision making and judgment errors are inventoried and presented as deviations from the scientific method. Also presented is evidence of judgmental inaccuracies in critical areas. A modus operandi called the "lab report" method is offered as a way to avoid making some of these errors. The lab report method is a way of conducting forensic evaluations in a more rational and scientific way, in much the same way as a good researcher would conduct a study. Using this method the clinician, like the researcher, uses clearly articulated alternative hypotheses with specifically operationalized measures. Data are collected in a systematic way to test each hypothesis, and consistent feedback is sought. Throughout the paper the scientific method is reviewed; evidence of problems applying it in clinical practice are presented, as are ways of overcoming these problems.

摘要

相似文献

1
Guide to identifying and correcting decision making errors in mental disability practice.
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1994;22(4):561-75.
2
How to assess and investigate a patient within a forensic psychiatry setting.如何在法医精神病学环境中评估和调查患者。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2004;14 Suppl 1:S37-42. doi: 10.1002/cbm.607.
3
An analogue study of the factors influencing competency decisions.一项关于影响能力决策因素的模拟研究。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1994;22(4):587-94.
4
Classifying clinical decision making: a unifying approach.临床决策分类:一种统一的方法。
J Adv Nurs. 2000 Oct;32(4):981-9.
5
Improving forensic tribunal decisions: the role of the clinician.
Behav Sci Law. 2007;25(4):485-506. doi: 10.1002/bsl.768.
6
Neuropsychological assessment of competency to stand trial evaluations: a practical conceptual model.受审能力评估的神经心理学评定:一个实用的概念模型
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1999;27(1):101-13.
7
Using judgement to improve accuracy in decision-making.运用判断力提高决策准确性。
Nurs Times. 2004;100(22):42-4.
8
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.
9
Decision making by surrogates.代理人的决策制定
Crit Care Nurse. 2000 Apr;20(2):107-11.
10
Understanding the relationship between mental disorder and violence: the need for a criminological perspective.理解精神障碍与暴力之间的关系:犯罪学视角的必要性。
Law Hum Behav. 2006 Dec;30(6):685-706. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9018-z. Epub 2006 Sep 14.