Jakobsson L, Hallberg I R, Lovén L, Ottosson B
Care Research and Development Unit, University of Lund, Sweden.
Int J Qual Health Care. 1994 Dec;6(4):361-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/6.4.361.
After a major cutback in the budget and staffing of a surgical clinic in southern Sweden there was intervention to improve the quality of nursing care and to evaluate the outcome. The intervention consisted of the implementation of: (1) nursing care organized in such a way that it would secure continuity of the nurse-patient relationship, (2) individually planned care by means of diagnostic reasoning, and (3) quality assurance for aspects believed to be connected with quality of care. Patient satisfaction before and after the intervention was assessed by means of a patient questionnaire survey (May 1991; n = 105 and May 1992; n = 137). Patient satisfaction improved significantly in variables related to nursing care viz. overall satisfaction and satisfaction with information and decision making; satisfaction with contact and staff-patient relationship; ward facilities and physical treatment or examinations; and satisfaction with physical nursing care. The results were interpreted to mean that the intervention may have counteracted any negative impact the reduced budget might have had such as the higher patient turn-over and the shorter in-patient periods, and thus seemed to have improved the quality of the nursing care in terms of patient satisfaction.
在瑞典南部一家外科诊所大幅削减预算和人员编制后,采取了干预措施以提高护理质量并评估结果。干预措施包括实施:(1)以确保护士与患者关系连续性的方式组织护理;(2)通过诊断推理进行个性化护理计划;(3)对与护理质量相关的方面进行质量保证。通过患者问卷调查(1991年5月;n = 105和1992年5月;n = 137)评估干预前后的患者满意度。在与护理相关的变量方面,患者满意度显著提高,即总体满意度以及对信息和决策的满意度;对接触和医护关系的满意度;病房设施以及物理治疗或检查;以及对身体护理的满意度。结果被解释为意味着该干预措施可能抵消了预算削减可能产生的任何负面影响,如更高的患者周转率和更短的住院时间,因此从患者满意度来看似乎提高了护理质量。