Feirabend H K, Kok P, Choufoer H, Ploeger S
Department of Physiology, University of Leiden, The Netherlands.
J Neurosci Methods. 1994 Dec;55(2):137-53. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(94)90206-2.
A qualitative comparison was made of a variety of electron microscopic preservation methods for nervous tissue, especially with respect to myelinated fiber areas. The methods studied were aldehyde perfusion/immersion fixation, aldehyde-tannic acid immersion fixation (stimulated by either microwave or conventional heating), microwave stabilisation, saline treatment with conventional heating (all with secondary osmication), and primary osmication. For all methods three morphological aspects, the ultrastructural quality of myelin sheath and axon and the coherence between the two were judged separately. It appears that the best version of each method studied is capable of providing a good overall ultrastructural result but always shows a preference for one or two of the three separate morphological aspects. When aiming at good axon quality together with good axon/myelin coherence, aldehyde perfusion/immersion, saline treatment or primary osmication are almost equivalent. Microwave stabilisation, on the other hand, can be chosen when good myelin quality has to be combined with good axon quality. For more specific purposes the following examples can be given. When excellent myelin quality is needed both microwave-stimulated aldehyde-tannic acid fixation or microwave stabilisation can be considered. When the preservation of the axon quality has priority the aldehyde-perfused tissue should be further immersed in a heated aldehyde-tannic acid solution. Primary osmication guarantees excellent axon/myelin coherence. Despite the differences in detail, a remarkable correspondence is stressed between the overall results of sometimes extremely different methods of tissue preservation. Probably they all guarantee a reliable reflection of the in vivo situation. With respect to the use of microwave irradiation for tissue preservation, it appeared that stabilisation procedures are rather capricious. However, if successful, the results are not inferior to those of aldehyde fixation.
对多种用于神经组织的电子显微镜保存方法进行了定性比较,特别是关于有髓纤维区域。所研究的方法包括醛灌注/浸泡固定、醛 - 单宁酸浸泡固定(通过微波或传统加热刺激)、微波稳定化、传统加热的盐水处理(均进行二次锇化)以及初次锇化。对于所有方法,分别从髓鞘和轴突的超微结构质量以及两者之间的连贯性这三个形态学方面进行判断。结果表明,所研究的每种方法的最佳版本都能够提供良好的整体超微结构结果,但总是在三个单独的形态学方面中的一两个方面表现出偏好。当旨在获得良好的轴突质量以及良好的轴突/髓鞘连贯性时,醛灌注/浸泡、盐水处理或初次锇化几乎等效。另一方面,当需要将良好的髓鞘质量与良好的轴突质量相结合时,可以选择微波稳定化。对于更具体的目的,可以给出以下示例。当需要优异的髓鞘质量时,可以考虑微波刺激的醛 - 单宁酸固定或微波稳定化。当轴突质量的保存具有优先权时,醛灌注的组织应进一步浸泡在加热的醛 - 单宁酸溶液中。初次锇化可确保优异的轴突/髓鞘连贯性。尽管在细节上存在差异,但强调了有时极为不同的组织保存方法的整体结果之间存在显著的对应关系。可能它们都能保证可靠地反映体内情况。关于使用微波辐射进行组织保存,结果表明稳定化程序相当多变。然而,如果成功,其结果并不逊色于醛固定的结果。