• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对社区获得性肺炎住院患者和门诊患者治疗前差异进行倾向评分调整。肺炎患者预后研究团队(PORT)研究者。

Propensity score adjustment for pretreatment differences between hospitalized and ambulatory patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) Investigators.

作者信息

Stone R A, Obrosky D S, Singer D E, Kapoor W N, Fine M J

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 1995 Apr;33(4 Suppl):AS56-66.

PMID:7723462
Abstract

A primary goal of the Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) multicenter cohort study is to identify a subgroup of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) who could be safely treated on an ambulatory basis. The medical outcomes of inpatients and outpatients are to be compared. Propensity score adjustment provides a unified way to control for pretreatment differences in the analysis of all the outcomes in this nonrandomized study by defining "comparable" patients as those with the same propensity score (i.e., the same probability of hospitalization). Data for 747 patients (35.5% hospitalized) with CAP in the Pneumonia PORT study illustrate the development and assessment of a propensity score adjustment. A classification tree algorithm defined seven propensity score strata with hospitalization probabilities ranging from 6.5% to 76.5%. Statistically significant pretreatment imbalances favoring the outpatients were found for 29 of 44 baseline variables considered; after stratification on the propensity score, only 13 of the 29 imbalances remained statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Post hoc stratification on the estimated propensity score consistently reduced, but did not completely eliminate, systematic baseline differences between ambulatory and hospitalized patients with CAP. Regression adjustment can be used in conjunction with propensity score stratification to adjust further for the remaining identified imbalances.

摘要

肺炎患者预后研究团队(PORT)多中心队列研究的一个主要目标是确定一组社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者,他们可以在门诊接受安全治疗。将比较住院患者和门诊患者的医疗结局。倾向评分调整通过将“可比”患者定义为具有相同倾向评分(即相同住院概率)的患者,为在这项非随机研究中分析所有结局时控制治疗前差异提供了一种统一方法。肺炎PORT研究中747例CAP患者(35.5%住院)的数据说明了倾向评分调整的开发和评估。一种分类树算法定义了七个倾向评分层,住院概率从6.5%到76.5%不等。在所考虑的44个基线变量中,有29个发现了有利于门诊患者的具有统计学意义的治疗前失衡;在按倾向评分分层后,29个失衡中只有13个在0.05水平上仍具有统计学意义。根据估计的倾向评分进行事后分层持续减少,但并未完全消除CAP门诊患者和住院患者之间的系统性基线差异。回归调整可与倾向评分分层结合使用,以进一步调整剩余的已识别失衡。

相似文献

1
Propensity score adjustment for pretreatment differences between hospitalized and ambulatory patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) Investigators.对社区获得性肺炎住院患者和门诊患者治疗前差异进行倾向评分调整。肺炎患者预后研究团队(PORT)研究者。
Med Care. 1995 Apr;33(4 Suppl):AS56-66.
2
The hospital admission decision for patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Results from the pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team cohort study.社区获得性肺炎患者的住院决策。肺炎患者预后研究团队队列研究的结果。
Arch Intern Med. 1997 Jan 13;157(1):36-44.
3
Preferences for home vs hospital care among low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎低风险患者对家庭护理与医院护理的偏好。
Arch Intern Med. 1996 Jul 22;156(14):1565-71.
4
Treatment failure rates and health care utilization and costs among patients with community-acquired pneumonia treated with levofloxacin or macrolides in an outpatient setting: a retrospective claims database analysis.门诊环境中接受左氧氟沙星或大环内酯类药物治疗的社区获得性肺炎患者的治疗失败率、医疗保健利用情况及成本:一项回顾性索赔数据库分析
Clin Ther. 2008 Feb;30(2):358-71. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.01.023.
5
Acute myocardial infarction in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎住院患者的急性心肌梗死
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Jul 15;47(2):182-7. doi: 10.1086/589246.
6
A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia.一种用于识别社区获得性肺炎低风险患者的预测规则。
N Engl J Med. 1997 Jan 23;336(4):243-50. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199701233360402.
7
[An addition to the clinical algorithm for treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia in Bosnia-Herzegovina: a multicenter prospective study in Sarajevo].[波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那社区获得性肺炎患者治疗临床算法的补充:萨拉热窝的一项多中心前瞻性研究]
Med Arh. 1999;53(3 Suppl 3):79-81.
8
Effect of pneumococcal vaccination in hospitalized adults with community-acquired pneumonia.肺炎球菌疫苗对社区获得性肺炎住院成人患者的影响。
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Oct 8;167(18):1938-43. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.18.1938.
9
Limited role for outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy for community-acquired pneumonia.门诊胃肠外抗生素治疗对社区获得性肺炎作用有限。
Respirology. 2008 Nov;13(6):893-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2008.01370.x.
10
A comparison of levofloxacin and moxifloxacin use in hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients in the US: focus on length of stay.美国住院社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者使用左氧氟沙星和莫西沙星的比较:以住院时间为重点。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Mar;24(3):895-906. doi: 10.1185/030079908X273408.

引用本文的文献

1
Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy: A propensity score matched analysis.术前化疗后乳腺癌的辅助化疗:倾向评分匹配分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 5;15(6):e0234173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234173. eCollection 2020.
2
K-Sample comparisons using propensity analysis.使用倾向分析进行K样本比较。
Biom J. 2019 May;61(3):698-713. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201800049. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
3
Understanding the Concept of Health Care-Associated Pneumonia in Lung Transplant Recipients.了解肺移植受者中医疗保健相关肺炎的概念。
Chest. 2015 Aug;148(2):516-522. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-1948.
4
Early versus later response to treatment in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: analysis of the REACH study.社区获得性肺炎患者的早期与晚期治疗反应:REACH 研究分析。
Respir Res. 2014 Jan 22;15(1):6. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-15-6.
5
How do emergency physicians make discharge decisions?急诊医生如何做出出院决定?
Emerg Med J. 2015 Jan;32(1):9-14. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-202421. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
6
A Propensity Score Matching Analysis of the Effects of Special Education Services.特殊教育服务效果的倾向得分匹配分析
J Spec Educ. 2010 Feb 1;43(4):236-254. doi: 10.1177/0022466908323007.
7
Relationships among initial hospital triage, disease progression and mortality in community-acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎的初始医院分诊、疾病进展和死亡率之间的关系。
Respirology. 2012 Nov;17(8):1207-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2012.02225.x.
8
The effect of participatory community communication on HIV preventive behaviors among ethnic minority youth in central Vietnam.中越边境少数民族青少年社区参与式交流对艾滋病预防行为的影响
BMC Public Health. 2012 Mar 8;12:170. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-170.
9
Propensity score matching in estimating the effect of managerial education on academic planning behavior. Study design: a cross-sectional study.倾向得分匹配法在估计管理教育对学术规划行为影响中的应用。研究设计:横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2011 Dec 8;11:102. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-102.
10
The effects of children's migration on elderly kin's health: a counterfactual approach.儿童迁移对老年亲属健康的影响:反事实方法。
Demography. 2011 Feb;48(1):183-209. doi: 10.1007/s13524-010-0002-3.