Khoury D S, Zhu W X, Nitta J, Rizo-Patron C, Maloney J D
Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1995 Jan;18(1 Pt 2):188-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb02502.x.
Management of multiple cardiac arrhythmias in some patients with both an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and a pacemaker has demonstrated several advantages. In such circumstances, it is imperative that pacemaker function and its programmed parameters be preserved following a defibrillation shock. This article describes the effects encountered by a specific programmable polarity pacemaker (RelayR 294-03) when subjected to electrical defibrillation in a canine model. Three pacemakers were repeatedly tested in three separate dog experiments. Each pacemaker, with its leads implanted in the right atrium and the right ventricle, was subjected to a minimum total number of 24 high energy biphasic and monophasic shocks (600-700 V) delivered by a coexisting ICD system using three different defibrillating lead configurations. None of the pacemaker systems showed any failure in function; all pacemakers continued to function within preshock specification and conversion to unipolar pacing and/or backup mode was not observed in any of the tests. Intracardiac electrical potentials measured directly off the ICD and the pacemaker leads, during a defibrillation shock (mean 566.6 V; 23.7 J), showed that potentials measured in a bipolar configuration (tip-ring: mean 21.0 V in atrium, 12.0 V in ventricle) were significantly less than potentials measured in a unipolar configuration (tip-can: mean 387.9 V in atrium, 394.0 V in ventricle; ring-can: mean 405.6 V in atrium, 395.4 V in ventricle). Our compatibility tests demonstrate that use of this programmable-polarity pacemaker in concert with an ICD system appears to be safe. Testing similar to the present study should be conducted prior to complete clinical acceptance of combined ICD and pacemaker implantation.
对于一些同时植入了植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)和起搏器的患者,多种心律失常的管理已显示出诸多优势。在这种情况下,除颤电击后必须保留起搏器功能及其程控参数。本文描述了一种特定的可编程极性起搏器(RelayR 294 - 03)在犬模型中接受电击除颤时所产生的影响。在三个单独的犬实验中对三个起搏器进行了反复测试。每个起搏器的电极分别植入右心房和右心室,使用三种不同的除颤电极配置,由共存的ICD系统施加至少24次高能双相和单相电击(600 - 700V)。没有一个起搏器系统显示出任何功能故障;所有起搏器在电击前的规格范围内继续工作,并且在任何测试中均未观察到转换为单极起搏和/或备用模式。在除颤电击期间(平均566.6V;23.7J),直接从ICD和起搏器电极测量的心内电位显示,双极配置(尖端 - 环:心房平均21.0V,心室平均12.0V)测量的电位明显低于单极配置(尖端 - 罐:心房平均387.9V,心室平均394.0V;环 - 罐:心房平均405.6V,心室平均395.4V)测量的电位。我们的兼容性测试表明,将这种可编程极性起搏器与ICD系统配合使用似乎是安全的。在ICD和起搏器联合植入被临床完全接受之前,应进行类似于本研究的测试。