Buss D M
Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-1109.
Am Psychol. 1995 Mar;50(3):164-8; discussion 169-71. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.50.3.164.
Men and women clearly differ in some psychological domains. A. H. Eagly (1995) shows that these differences are not artifactual or unstable. Ideally, the next scientific step is to develop a cogent explanatory framework for understanding why the sexes differ in some psychological domains and not in others and for generating accurate predictions about sex differences as yet undiscovered. This article offers a brief outline of an explanatory framework for psychological sex differences--one that is anchored in the new theoretical paradigm of evolutionary psychology. Men and women differ, in this view, in domains in which they have faced different adaptive problems over human evolutionary history. In all other domains, the sexes are predicted to be psychologically similar. Evolutionary psychology jettisons the false dichotomy between biology and environment and provides a powerful metatheory of why sex differences exist, where they exist, and in what contexts they are expressed (D. M. Buss, 1995).
男性和女性在某些心理领域显然存在差异。A. H. 伊格利(1995年)指出,这些差异并非人为造成或不稳定的。理想情况下,下一个科学步骤是建立一个有说服力的解释框架,以理解为何两性在某些心理领域存在差异而在其他领域不存在差异,并对尚未发现的性别差异做出准确预测。本文简要概述了一个关于心理性别差异的解释框架——该框架基于进化心理学的新理论范式。按照这种观点,男性和女性在人类进化史上面临不同适应性问题的领域存在差异。在所有其他领域,预计两性在心理上是相似的。进化心理学摒弃了生物学与环境之间的错误二分法,并提供了一个强大的元理论,解释性别差异为何存在、存在于何处以及在何种背景下表现出来(D. M. 巴斯,1995年)。