Zhang Yongxin, Chen Bingran, Ding Qian, Wei Hua
School of Education Science, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang, China.
Normal College, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 14;15:1296516. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1296516. eCollection 2024.
Although numerous studies have used Chinese samples to examine the consequences of parental phubbing, these studies focused on children's mental health and peer interaction. No research to date has directly explored the association between parental phubbing and child-parent interaction. Since parental phubbing is a way how parents interact with their children (parent-child), it might be associated with the way how children interact with their parents (child-parent), such as filial piety behavior, which prescribes how children behave toward their parents and remains one of the goals of parents in educating their children in modern Chinese society. Based on social exchange theory and social gender theory, this study investigated the impact of parental phubbing on filial piety behavior and tested its mediation of perceived parental rejection, its moderation of gender among children and adolescents.
This study was conducted using a questionnaire method. A total of 753 students from Grade 4 to 9 ( = 12.28 years, SD = 1.81 years) was surveyed using the Parental Phubbing Scale, Perceived Parental Rejection Questionnaire, and the revised Dual Filial Piety Scale.
First, parental phubbing was negatively correlated with reciprocal filial piety (RFP) behavior, but not correlated with authoritarian filial piety (AFP) behavior. Second, perceived parental rejection played a mediating role between parental phubbing and RFP behavior. Third, this direct effect was moderated by gender, in that it was stronger for boys than for girls.
These findings suggest that there are intergenerational costs of phubbing, such as reducing children and adolescents' RFP behavior. The present study is the first to combine parent-child interaction in the digital media era (parental phubbing) with traditional Chinese child-parent interaction (RFP behavior), which expands the research topic on the influence of parental phubbing on children and adolescents' psychological development.
尽管众多研究已采用中国样本考察父母低头族行为的后果,但这些研究聚焦于儿童的心理健康和同伴互动。迄今为止,尚无研究直接探究父母低头族行为与亲子互动之间的关联。由于父母低头族行为是父母与子女互动(亲子互动)的一种方式,它可能与子女与父母互动(子亲互动)的方式相关,比如孝道行为,孝道规定了子女如何对待父母,并且在现代中国社会仍是父母教育子女的目标之一。基于社会交换理论和社会性别理论,本研究调查了父母低头族行为对孝道行为的影响,并检验了其对感知到的父母拒绝的中介作用,以及在儿童和青少年中的性别调节作用。
本研究采用问卷调查法。使用父母低头族量表、感知到的父母拒绝问卷和修订后的双向孝道量表,对753名四至九年级学生(平均年龄=12.28岁,标准差=1.81岁)进行了调查。
首先,父母低头族行为与互惠性孝道(RFP)行为呈负相关,但与权威性孝道(AFP)行为无相关性。其次,感知到的父母拒绝在父母低头族行为和RFP行为之间起中介作用。第三,这种直接效应存在性别调节作用,即对男孩的影响强于女孩。
这些发现表明,低头族行为存在代际代价,比如会减少儿童和青少年的RFP行为。本研究首次将数字媒体时代的亲子互动(父母低头族行为)与中国传统的子亲互动(RFP行为)相结合,拓展了关于父母低头族行为对儿童和青少年心理发展影响的研究主题。