Warner J J, Miller M D, Marks P, Fu F H
Shoulder Service, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.
Arthroscopy. 1995 Feb;11(1):2-13. doi: 10.1016/0749-8063(95)90082-9.
Although arthroscopic Bankart repair has become an accepted surgical stabilization technique for anterior shoulder instability, the failure rate remains unacceptably high. Little information is available concerning healing of the Bankart repair. The purpose of this article is to clarify this issue by analyzing a cohort of 15 patients who underwent a "second-look" arthroscopy to evaluate and treat pain or recurrent instability following arthroscopic Bankart repair with the Suretac device (Acufex Microsurgical, Mansfield, MA). "Second-look" arthroscopy was performed at an average of 9 months following the index surgical procedure. The reasons for this second surgery were recurrent instability in 7, pain in 6, and pain and stiffness in 2. In the 7 patients with recurrent instability, the Bankart repair was found to be completely healed in 3 (43%), partially healed in 1 (14%), and had recurred in 3 (43%); however, 6 of 7 were observed to have lax capsular tissue. In 4 of these cases, retrospective review of the index surgical procedure showed that a technical error had been made during the repair. Two cases had biopsy of the repair site on "second-look" at 6 to 8 months, and this showed residual polyglyconate polymer debris surrounded by a histiocytic infiltrate. In the remaining 8 cases with stable shoulders, the Bankart repair had completely healed in 5 cases (62.5%) and partially healed in 3 cases (37.5%). The higher failure rate with this approach compared with open approaches appears to result from improper patient selection and errors in surgical technique. There is some question concerning healing strength of the Bankart repair, although complete healing of the Bankart does not seem to be a prerequesite for shoulder stability. Success of the procedure might be expected to improve by selecting only patients with unidirectional, posttraumatic, anterior instability who are found to have a discrete Bankart lesion and well-developed ligamentous tissue.
尽管关节镜下Bankart修复术已成为治疗肩关节前向不稳的一种被认可的手术稳定技术,但失败率仍然高得令人难以接受。关于Bankart修复术的愈合情况,目前可获得的信息很少。本文的目的是通过分析一组15例患者来阐明这一问题,这些患者接受了“二次探查”关节镜检查,以评估和治疗使用Suretac装置(Acufex Microsurgical,曼斯菲尔德,马萨诸塞州)进行关节镜下Bankart修复术后的疼痛或复发性不稳。“二次探查”关节镜检查平均在初次手术操作后9个月进行。二次手术的原因是7例复发性不稳、6例疼痛以及2例疼痛和僵硬。在7例复发性不稳的患者中,发现Bankart修复完全愈合的有3例(43%),部分愈合的有1例(14%),复发的有3例(43%);然而,7例中有6例观察到有松弛的关节囊组织。在其中4例中,对初次手术操作的回顾性检查显示修复过程中存在技术失误。2例在6至8个月的“二次探查”时对修复部位进行了活检,结果显示残留的聚乙醇酸聚合物碎片被组织细胞浸润包围。在其余8例肩部稳定的患者中,Bankart修复完全愈合的有5例(62.5%),部分愈合的有3例(37.5%)。与开放手术相比,这种方法较高的失败率似乎是由于患者选择不当和手术技术失误所致。尽管Bankart修复的愈合强度存在一些问题,但Bankart的完全愈合似乎并不是肩关节稳定的先决条件。通过仅选择具有单向、创伤后、前向不稳且发现有离散的Bankart损伤和发育良好的韧带组织的患者,该手术的成功率可能会提高。