Suppr超能文献

慢性哮喘与整脊脊柱推拿:一项随机临床试验。

Chronic asthma and chiropractic spinal manipulation: a randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Nielsen N H, Bronfort G, Bendix T, Madsen F, Weeke B

机构信息

National University Hospital (Rigshospitalet), Medical Department TTA, Allergy Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Clin Exp Allergy. 1995 Jan;25(1):80-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1995.tb01006.x.

Abstract

The purpose of this randomized patient- and observer-blinded cross-over trial was to evaluate the efficacy of chiropractic treatment in the management of chronic asthma when combined with pharmaceutical maintenance therapy. The trial was conducted at the National University Hospital's Out-patient Clinic in Copenhagen, Denmark. Thirty-one patients aged 18-44 years participated, all suffering from chronic asthma controlled by bronchodilators and/or inhaled steroids. Patients, or who had received chiropractic treatment for asthma within the last 5 years, who received oral steroids and immunotherapy, were not eligible. Patients were randomized to receive either active chiropractic spinal manipulative treatment or sham chiropractic spinal manipulative treatment twice weekly for 4 weeks, and then crossed over to the alternative treatment for another 4 weeks. Both phases were preceded and followed by a 2-week period without chiropractic treatment. The main outcome measurements were forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), daily use of inhaled bronchodilators, patient-rated asthma severity and non-specific bronchial reactivity (n-BR). Using the cross-over analysis, no clinically important or statistically significant differences were found between the active and sham chiropractic interventions on any of the main or secondary outcome measures. Objective lung function did not change during the study, but over the course of the study, non-specific bronchial hyperreactivity (n-BR) improved by 36% (P = 0.01) and patient-rated asthma severity decreased by 34% (P = 0.0002) compared with the baseline values.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

这项随机、患者和观察者双盲的交叉试验旨在评估脊椎按摩疗法与药物维持疗法联合使用时在慢性哮喘管理中的疗效。该试验在丹麦哥本哈根国立大学医院门诊进行。31名年龄在18至44岁之间的患者参与其中,他们均患有由支气管扩张剂和/或吸入性类固醇控制的慢性哮喘。在过去5年内接受过哮喘脊椎按摩治疗、接受过口服类固醇和免疫疗法的患者不符合条件。患者被随机分为两组,一组每周接受两次脊椎按摩脊柱手法治疗,另一组接受假脊椎按摩脊柱手法治疗,为期4周,然后交叉接受另一种治疗,为期4周。两个阶段前后均有为期2周的无脊椎按摩治疗期。主要结局指标为第1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)、用力肺活量(FVC)、吸入性支气管扩张剂的每日使用量、患者自评哮喘严重程度和非特异性支气管反应性(n-BR)。采用交叉分析,在任何主要或次要结局指标上,积极的脊椎按摩干预与假干预之间均未发现具有临床重要意义或统计学显著差异。研究期间客观肺功能未发生变化,但与基线值相比,在研究过程中,非特异性支气管高反应性(n-BR)改善了36%(P = 0.01),患者自评哮喘严重程度降低了34%(P = 0.0002)。(摘要截短至250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验