Niroomand F, Weinbrenner C, Weis A, Bangert M, Schwencke C, Marquetant R, Beyer T, Strasser R H, Kübler W, Rauch B
Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
Circ Res. 1995 May;76(5):861-70. doi: 10.1161/01.res.76.5.861.
A brief antecedent period of myocardial ischemia and reperfusion can delay cellular injury during a subsequent ischemic condition. Recent observations suggest that this protective mechanism depends on the continued activation of adenosine A1 receptors and Gi proteins. During acute myocardial ischemia, sufficient amounts of adenosine for maximal activation of adenosine A1 receptors are released, independent of a preconditioning ischemia. Hence, the protective mechanism of ischemic preconditioning may not exclusively be explained by activation of adenosine A1 receptors. As a working hypothesis, an increased responsiveness of Gi proteins toward receptor-mediated activation, leading to an increased response of Gi-regulated effectors, was tested in this study. In 47 anesthetized dogs, ischemia was induced by proximal ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Animals underwent either a single period of 5 minutes of ischemia (n = 9), a single period of 15 minutes of ischemia (n = 10), 5 minutes of ischemia followed by 15 minutes of reperfusion (n = 8), 15 minutes of ischemia followed by 60 minutes of reperfusion (n = 5), or 5 minutes of ischemia followed by 15 minutes of reperfusion and a second period of 5 minutes of ischemia (n = 15). Sarcolemmal membranes were prepared from the central ischemic area and from the posterior left ventricular wall, which served as the control. During ischemia, carbochol-stimulated GTPase decreased by 38% (control, 33.5 +/- 17.7; ischemia, 24.2 +/- 15 pmol.min-1.mg protein-1; n = 9; P < .001). The decrease in carbachol-stimulated GTPase activity was associated with a 45% decrease in carbachol-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase (control, 28.9 +/- 2.4% maximal inhibition; ischemia, 15.1 +/- 2.6% maximal inhibition; n = 5; P < .001). Prolongation of the ischemic period to 15 minutes did not lead to a further reduction of the Gi-mediated signal transduction. The binding properties of muscarinic receptors were not affected by ischemia. Furthermore, as demonstrated by carbachol-stimulated binding of [gamma-35S]GTP to sarcolemmal membranes, high- and low-affinity binding sites for the muscarinic antagonist carbachol, the EC50 for carbachol-stimulated GTPase activity and the substrate dependency of the high-affinity GTPase, the interaction between muscarinic receptors and inhibitory G proteins, and GTP binding to G proteins were not altered (n = 14). Immunoblotting with alpha 1- and alpha 2-specific antibodies did not indicate a loss of Gi proteins during ischemia that could explain the reduced GTPase activity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
心肌缺血和再灌注的短暂前期可延迟随后缺血状态下的细胞损伤。最近的观察结果表明,这种保护机制依赖于腺苷A1受体和Gi蛋白的持续激活。在急性心肌缺血期间,可释放出足以使腺苷A1受体最大程度激活的腺苷量,这与预处理缺血无关。因此,缺血预处理的保护机制可能无法完全通过腺苷A1受体的激活来解释。作为一个工作假设,本研究测试了Gi蛋白对受体介导激活的反应性增加,导致Gi调节效应器的反应增加。在47只麻醉犬中,通过结扎左前降支冠状动脉近端诱导缺血。动物分别经历单次5分钟缺血(n = 9)、单次15分钟缺血(n = 10)、5分钟缺血后再灌注15分钟(n = 8)、15分钟缺血后再灌注60分钟(n = 5)或5分钟缺血后再灌注15分钟以及第二次5分钟缺血(n = 15)。从中央缺血区域和左心室后壁制备肌膜,左心室后壁作为对照。在缺血期间,卡巴胆碱刺激的GTP酶活性降低了38%(对照,33.5±17.7;缺血,24.2±15 pmol·min-1·mg蛋白-1;n = 9;P <.001)。卡巴胆碱刺激的GTP酶活性降低与卡巴胆碱介导的腺苷酸环化酶抑制作用降低45%相关(对照,最大抑制率为28.9±2.4%;缺血,最大抑制率为15.1±2.6%;n = 5;P <.001)。将缺血时间延长至15分钟并未导致Gi介导的信号转导进一步降低。毒蕈碱受体的结合特性不受缺血影响。此外,正如卡巴胆碱刺激的[γ-35S]GTP与肌膜结合所证明的,毒蕈碱拮抗剂卡巴胆碱的高亲和力和低亲和力结合位点、卡巴胆碱刺激的GTP酶活性的EC50以及高亲和力GTP酶的底物依赖性、毒蕈碱受体与抑制性G蛋白之间的相互作用以及GTP与G蛋白的结合均未改变(n = 14)。用α1和α2特异性抗体进行免疫印迹未表明缺血期间Gi蛋白丢失,这可以解释GTP酶活性降低的原因。(摘要截断于400字)