• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

广岛和长崎住宅中的氡浓度。

Radon concentrations in residential housing in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

作者信息

Yonehara H, Aoyama T, Radford E P, Kato H, Sakanoue M

机构信息

Department of Experimental Radiology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Japan.

出版信息

Health Phys. 1995 May;68(5):683-8. doi: 10.1097/00004032-199505000-00008.

DOI:10.1097/00004032-199505000-00008
PMID:7730065
Abstract

A measurement of indoor radon (222Rn) concentrations in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was carried out to assess the variability of exposure expected among atomic bomb survivors. Two hundred dwellings, mostly belonging to members of the fixed cohort of atomic bomb survivors under study by the Radiation Effects Research Foundations, were selected for this measurement. The geometric mean values of the radon concentrations for 100 dwellings in Hiroshima and 99 dwellings in Nagasaki measured by Track-Etch Type SF detectors were 56.8 Bq m-3 and 28.5 Bq m-3, respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed between lung cancer mortalities in the low-dose range in the two cities. However, apparent values of the mortality rate for low dose range in Hiroshima are consistently greater than those in Nagasaki. The exposure to radon and its progeny and the atomic bomb radiation effect might have some cooperative effects on the lung cancer incidence.

摘要

为评估原子弹幸存者中预期的暴露变异性,对广岛和长崎的室内氡(222Rn)浓度进行了测量。此次测量选取了200处住宅,其中大部分属于辐射效应研究基金会正在研究的原子弹幸存者固定队列的成员。通过径迹蚀刻型SF探测器测量的广岛100处住宅和长崎99处住宅的氡浓度几何平均值分别为56.8 Bq m-3和28.5 Bq m-3。两个城市低剂量范围内的肺癌死亡率之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异。然而,广岛低剂量范围死亡率的表观值始终高于长崎。氡及其子体暴露与原子弹辐射效应可能对肺癌发病率有一些协同作用。

相似文献

1
Radon concentrations in residential housing in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.广岛和长崎住宅中的氡浓度。
Health Phys. 1995 May;68(5):683-8. doi: 10.1097/00004032-199505000-00008.
2
The Iowa radon lung cancer study--phase I: Residential radon gas exposure and lung cancer.爱荷华氡气致肺癌研究——第一阶段:住宅氡气暴露与肺癌
Sci Total Environ. 2001 May 14;272(1-3):67-72. doi: 10.1016/s0048-9697(01)00666-0.
3
Indoor exposure to 222Rn: a public health perspective.室内接触氡-222:公共卫生视角
Health Phys. 1998 Sep;75(3):297-302. doi: 10.1097/00004032-199809000-00009.
4
Dosimetric challenges for residential radon epidemiology.住宅氡气流行病学的剂量测定挑战。
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2006 Apr;69(7):655-64. doi: 10.1080/15287390500261141.
5
Experience from retrospective radon exposure estimations for individuals in a radon epidemiological study using solid-state nuclear track detectors.在一项使用固态核径迹探测器的氡气流行病学研究中,对个体进行回顾性氡气暴露估计的经验。
Sci Total Environ. 2001 May 14;272(1-3):61-6. doi: 10.1016/s0048-9697(01)00665-9.
6
Study of radon concentrations in oil refinery premises and city dwellings.炼油厂厂区和城市住宅中氡浓度的研究。
J Radiol Prot. 2001 Jun;21(2):163-70. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/21/2/306.
7
Radon exposure and lung cancer risk--Czech cohort study on residential radon.氡暴露与肺癌风险——捷克住宅氡队列研究
Sci Total Environ. 2001 May 14;272(1-3):43-51. doi: 10.1016/s0048-9697(01)00663-5.
8
Indoor radon measurements in Turkey dwellings.土耳其住宅内的氡气测量
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2015 Dec;167(4):626-32. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncu329. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
9
Lung cancer risk from radon exposure in dwellings in Sweden: how many cases can be prevented if radon levels are lowered?瑞典住宅中氡暴露导致的肺癌风险:如果降低氡水平,可预防多少病例?
Cancer Causes Control. 2015 Apr;26(4):541-7. doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0531-6. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
10
Radon-thoron discriminative measurements in Gansu Province, China, and their implication for dose estimates.中国甘肃省氡-钍判别测量及其对剂量估算的意义。
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2006 Apr;69(7):723-34. doi: 10.1080/15287390500261265.

引用本文的文献

1
Radon and lung cancer risk: taking stock at the millenium.氡与肺癌风险:千禧年的总结
Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Aug;108 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):635-41. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108s4635.