Raghavendra P, Fristoe M
Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Speech Hear Res. 1995 Feb;38(1):174-86. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3801.174.
The present investigation studied the effects of enhancements on the learning, retention, transfer to the unlearned form, and use of Blissymbols in 40 normal 3-year-old children. The subjects, seen individually, learned either 12 standard Blissymbols (SBS) or the same 12 symbols in the enhanced form (EBS). The symbols were introduced with short explanations. The number of trials taken to reach > 90% correct identification, the number of symbols selected appropriately to complete a communicative act, the number of symbols correctly identified a week after the acquisition phase was completed, and the number of symbols correctly identified in the untrained form of Blissymbols were determined. The results demonstrated that the subjects learned EBS faster than SBS, remembered more EBS than SBS in the retention task, did not differ in the communicative use of SBS and EBS, and were affected more negatively when presented with SBS than EBS in a task where the untrained form was presented. The results are discussed in terms of how very young children might benefit more from an illustration system such as EBS than from an orthographic system such as SBS.
本研究调查了增强形式对40名3岁正常儿童学习、记忆、向未学形式迁移以及使用布利兹符号的影响。这些受试者单独接受测试,他们学习12个标准布利兹符号(SBS)或相同的12个增强形式的符号(EBS)。这些符号通过简短的解释进行介绍。记录达到90%以上正确识别所需的试验次数、为完成交流行为而正确选择的符号数量、习得阶段完成一周后正确识别的符号数量以及以未训练形式的布利兹符号正确识别的符号数量。结果表明,受试者学习EBS的速度比SBS快,在记忆任务中记住的EBS比SBS多,在SBS和EBS的交流使用方面没有差异,并且在呈现未训练形式的任务中,与EBS相比,呈现SBS时受到的负面影响更大。本文根据幼儿如何可能从诸如EBS的图示系统中比从诸如SBS的正字法系统中受益更多来讨论这些结果。