Rodés J, Trilla A, Asenjo M A, Grau J
Unitat de Recerca Epidemiològica, Fundació Clínic per a la Recerca Biomèdica, Hospital Clínic i Provincial, Universitat de Barcelona.
Med Clin (Barc). 1995 Mar 11;104(9):321-8.
The development of an evaluation protocol for assessing the scientific contribution and the impact on medical care of the sabbatical leaves granted in a large Spanish teaching hospital.
The sabbatical leaves for all faculty staff of the Hospital Clínic i Provincial of Barcelona (HCPB) were analyzed since 1980 trough 1991. The scientific production analysis was done according to the impact factor (IF) score of the Science Citation Index. Descriptive statistical techniques as well as parametric and non-parametric tests were used for comparisons.
A total of 52 sabbatical leaves was analyzed of all 60 leaves granted (87%). Mean duration of the leave was 7.94 +/- 3.86 months. The scientific production includes 89 original articles published in peer-reviewed medical journals, with a total score of 300.82 IF points (mean score: 5.78 +/- 7.12 IF points by leave). There were significant differences in the mean duration, number of papers published and IF points score by sabbatical leave between the Medicine, Surgery and Other Departments. In 16 cases (31%) there was a professional promotion following the sabbatical leave and in 20 cases (39%) an academic promotion. In 27 cases (60%) there was no promotion after the leave. Most of the faculty staff physicians (96%) are still employed in the same institution, and believe that the sabbatical leave has significantly contributed to their promotion (67%). A high percentage (94%) has also been able to develop afterwards the methods and techniques learned during the sabbatical leave.
The experience of the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona in granting sabbatical leaves has been highly positive. The scientific performance of the individuals on leave is high. Our institution has been able to add and develop most of the techniques and methods learned overseas. The future of the sabbatical leaves in other Spanish Universities and Hospitals should be regarded as a high priority target. The performance of these leaves is supported by its scientific results, that could be quantified.
制定一项评估协议，以评估西班牙一家大型教学医院批准的学术休假的科学贡献及其对医疗护理的影响。
分析了1980年至1991年巴塞罗那临床医院（HCPB）所有教职员工的学术休假情况。根据科学引文索引的影响因子（IF）得分进行科研产出分析。采用描述性统计技术以及参数检验和非参数检验进行比较。
共分析了60次批准的学术休假中的52次（87%）。休假的平均时长为7.94±3.86个月。科研产出包括在同行评审医学期刊上发表的89篇原创文章，总影响因子得分为300.82分（每次休假平均得分：5.78±7.12分）。医学、外科和其他科室之间在学术休假的平均时长、发表论文数量和影响因子得分方面存在显著差异。16例（31%）在学术休假后获得了职业晋升，20例（39%）获得了学术晋升。27例（60%）在休假后没有晋升。大多数教职医生（96%）仍受雇于同一机构，并认为学术休假对他们的晋升有显著贡献（67%）。很大比例（94%）的人之后也能够运用在学术休假期间学到的方法和技术。
巴塞罗那临床医院批准学术休假的经验非常积极。休假人员的科研表现很高。我们的机构能够吸收并发展在海外学到的大部分技术和方法。西班牙其他大学和医院的学术休假未来应被视为高度优先目标。这些休假的成效得到了可量化的科学成果的支持。
