Nicolás A L, Munz P L, Young C S
Department of Microbiology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Mar 25;23(6):1036-43. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.6.1036.
The joining of DNA double-strand breaks in vivo is frequently accompanied by the loss of a few nucleotides at the junction between the interacting partners. In vitro systems mimic this loss and, on detailed analysis, have suggested two models for the mechanism of end-joining. One invokes the use of extensive homologous side-by-side alignment of the partners prior to joining, while the other proposes the use of small regions of homology located at or near the terminus of the interacting molecules. to discriminate between these two models, assays were conducted both in vitro and in vivo with specially designed substrates. In vitro, molecules with limited terminal homology were capable of joining, but analysis of the junctions suggested that the mechanism employed the limited homology available. In vivo, the substrates with no extensive homology end-joined with equal efficiency to those with extensive homology in two different topological arrangements. Taken together, these results suggest that extensive homology is not a prerequisite for efficient end-joining, but that small homologies close to the terminus are used preferentially, as predicted by the modified single-strand annealing model.
体内DNA双链断裂的连接常常伴随着相互作用的双链在连接处丢失几个核苷酸。体外系统模拟了这种丢失,经过详细分析,提出了两种末端连接机制模型。一种模型认为,在连接之前,相互作用的双链需要进行广泛的同源并排排列;另一种模型则提出,利用位于相互作用分子末端或其附近的小同源区域。为了区分这两种模型,使用专门设计的底物在体外和体内进行了检测。在体外,具有有限末端同源性的分子能够连接,但对连接处的分析表明,该机制利用了可用的有限同源性。在体内,没有广泛同源性的底物与具有广泛同源性的底物在两种不同拓扑结构下以相同效率进行末端连接。综合这些结果表明,广泛的同源性不是有效末端连接的先决条件,但正如改良的单链退火模型所预测的那样,靠近末端的小同源性被优先利用。