• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对弱势家庭进行研究时存在的问题。

Issues in conducting research with vulnerable families.

作者信息

Demi A S, Warren N A

机构信息

School of Nursing, Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA.

出版信息

West J Nurs Res. 1995 Apr;17(2):188-202. doi: 10.1177/019394599501700206.

DOI:10.1177/019394599501700206
PMID:7732685
Abstract

This article explores methodological and ethical issues in the conduct of research with vulnerable families. Some methodological and ethical issues are common to all family research, regardless of the families' vulnerability; however, many research issues are more problematic in vulnerable families, and a few issues are relatively unique to vulnerable families. Vulnerable families are defined as families that are susceptible to harm because of their socioeconomic status, their minority status, or other stigmatizing status. Methodological issues include definition of family; recruitment and retention of participants; reliability and validity of instruments; and racism, classism, and sexism. Ethical issues include confidentiality, reporting abuse and neglect, conflict of research ethics and personal ethics, identifying problems nobody can fix, balancing demands and benefits, and interpretation of data. Examples of methodological and ethical issues are drawn from several research studies in which the primary author was or is currently involved.

摘要

本文探讨了对弱势家庭开展研究时的方法学和伦理问题。一些方法学和伦理问题在所有家庭研究中都很常见,无论家庭是否弱势;然而,许多研究问题在弱势家庭中更具挑战性,还有一些问题相对而言是弱势家庭所特有的。弱势家庭被定义为因其社会经济地位、少数族裔身份或其他污名化身份而容易受到伤害的家庭。方法学问题包括家庭的定义;参与者的招募与留存;工具的可靠性和有效性;以及种族主义、阶级主义和性别歧视。伦理问题包括保密性、报告虐待和忽视行为、研究伦理与个人伦理的冲突、识别无法解决的问题、平衡需求与益处以及数据解读。方法学和伦理问题的示例取自几项主要作者参与过或目前仍在参与的研究。

相似文献

1
Issues in conducting research with vulnerable families.对弱势家庭进行研究时存在的问题。
West J Nurs Res. 1995 Apr;17(2):188-202. doi: 10.1177/019394599501700206.
2
Ethical problems in research on families who are abusing children.对虐待儿童家庭进行研究时的伦理问题。
Nurs Ethics. 1998 May;5(3):200-5. doi: 10.1177/096973309800500303.
3
Methodological issues associated with group intervention research.与团体干预研究相关的方法学问题。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2006 Dec;20(6):276-81. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2006.05.003.
4
Methodological issues in interviewing families in family nursing research.
J Adv Nurs. 2001 Jul;35(2):288-93. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01845.x.
5
Ethics and nursing research. 2: Examination of the research process.
Br J Nurs. 1999;8(14):956-60. doi: 10.12968/bjon.1999.8.14.6548.
6
Conceptual and pragmatic considerations in conducting a secondary analysis. An example from research of families.进行二次分析时的概念性和实用性考量。来自家庭研究的一个例子。
West J Nurs Res. 1999 Apr;21(2):154-67. doi: 10.1177/01939459922043802.
7
Issues to consider when choosing and using large national databases for research of families.在选择和使用大型国家数据库进行家庭研究时需要考虑的问题。
West J Nurs Res. 1999 Apr;21(2):143-53. doi: 10.1177/01939459922043794.
8
The substance-abusing family: consideration for nursing research.药物滥用家庭:护理研究的考量
J Pediatr Nurs. 1991 Feb;6(1):49-56.
9
The strengths and weaknesses of quantitative and qualitative research: what method for nursing?定量研究和定性研究的优缺点:护理学应采用何种方法?
J Adv Nurs. 1994 Oct;20(4):716-21. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1994.20040716.x.
10
Advancing nursing science in vulnerable populations: measurement issues.推进弱势群体护理科学:测量问题
Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2007;25:27-48.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding parental consent and trust in paediatric LRTI research: insights from a qualitative study in Indonesia.理解印度尼西亚一项关于儿童下呼吸道感染研究中的家长同意与信任:来自定性研究的见解
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 13;25(1):2749. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24039-7.
2
A New Measure of Research Participant Burden: Brief Report.研究参与者负担的一种新度量:简要报告。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014 Oct;9(4):46-9. doi: 10.1177/1556264614545037.
3
A Multipronged, Adaptive Approach for the Recruitment of Diverse Community-Residing Elders with Memory Impairment: The MIND at Home Experience.
一种多管齐下的适应性方法,用于招募社区中患有记忆障碍的不同老年人:居家记忆与认知体验研究。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2015 Jul;23(7):698-708. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
4
Research strategies: lessons learned from the studies of Chinese Americans and Korean Americans.研究策略:从美籍华裔和韩裔美国人研究中吸取的经验教训。
J Transcult Nurs. 2010 Jul;21(3):265-70. doi: 10.1177/1043659609358786.
5
OPERATIONAL LESSONS FROM THE PATHWAYS TO DESISTANCE PROJECT.“停止犯罪途径”项目的运作经验教训
Youth Violence Juv Justice. 2004 Jan 1;2(3):237. doi: 10.1177/1541204004265875.
6
Guidelines to support nurse-researchers reflect on role conflict in qualitative interviewing.支持护士研究者反思定性访谈中角色冲突的指南。
Open Nurs J. 2008;2:58-62. doi: 10.2174/1874434600802010058. Epub 2008 Jun 10.
7
Enacting a theory of caring to recruit and retain vulnerable participants for sensitive research.践行关爱理论以招募和留住弱势群体参与敏感性研究。
Res Nurs Health. 2006 Jun;29(3):244-52. doi: 10.1002/nur.20134.