Rawles J M, Kenmure A C
Br Med J. 1976 May 8;1(6018):1121-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6018.1121.
Two-hundred consecutive patients thought to have suffered a myocardial infarction were admitted to a randomised, double-blind controlled trial of oxygen or air administered by MC mask throughout the first 24 hours in hospital. Forty-three patients in whom myocardial infarction was not subsequently confirmed were excluded from the analysis. The remaining air and oxygen groups were comparable except for a significantly higher PaO2 and serum aspartate aminotransferase level in the oxygen group. There was no significant difference in mortality, incidence of arrhythmias, use of analgesics, or systolic time intervals between the two groups, although a higher incidence of sinus tachycardia was found in those given oxygen. There appears to be no evidence of benefit from the routine administration of oxygen in uncomplicated myocardial infarction.
连续200例疑似心肌梗死的患者被纳入一项随机双盲对照试验,在入院后的最初24小时内,通过MC面罩给予氧气或空气。43例随后未确诊为心肌梗死的患者被排除在分析之外。除氧疗组的动脉血氧分压(PaO2)和血清天冬氨酸转氨酶水平显著较高外,其余空气组和氧疗组具有可比性。两组在死亡率、心律失常发生率、镇痛药使用情况或收缩期时间间期方面无显著差异,尽管吸氧患者窦性心动过速的发生率较高。对于无并发症的心肌梗死患者,常规吸氧似乎没有益处。