Do elderly patients overutilize healthcare resources and benefit less from them than younger patients? A study of patients who underwent craniotomy for treatment of neoplasm.

OBJECTIVE

Some physicians and academicians have suggested that limiting selected healthcare resources to the elderly will help curtail the rising cost of health care in the United States. In order to test this hypothesis in a specific medical context, we compared the cost of caring for younger (< 65 yrs) patients with that of caring for older (> or = 65 yrs) patients who underwent craniotomy for treatment of brain tumors.

DESIGN

Prospective collection and review of data on patients undergoing craniotomy for tumor in our institution between February 1989 and December 1991.

SETTING

University teaching hospital.

METHODS

Patients were divided into two groups: those < 65 yrs, and those > or = 65 yrs. Demographics, severity of illness, length of stay, hospital and surgical intensive care unit (ICU) costs and charges, ICU complications, procedures, and outcome variables were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 3,265 ICU patients admitted during the study period, data on 123 (3.8%) undergoing craniotomy for brain tumor were analyzed. There were no differences between the patient groups in length of ICU stay or hospital stay, final outcome at discharge from the hospital, quality of life, or hospital or ICU costs, despite the fact that elderly patients had a greater number of procedures and complications per patient, and higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) severity of illness scores on admission and discharge than younger patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The assertion that the elderly may, under certain conditions, consume more healthcare resources and benefit less from them than younger patients must be tested for accuracy with regard to specific disease states. In the context of the disorder studied herein, the elderly do as well as the young. Without specific study of specific pathologic processes or surgical procedures, using age to limit access to resources remains an unsubstantiated, ideologic concept, rather than a scientifically proven cost-saving measure.