Sloan F A, Shayne M W, Conover C J
Duke University, USA.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1995 Spring;20(1):75-98. doi: 10.1215/03616878-20-1-75.
Continuing care retirement communities (CCRCs) combine housing and long-term care (LTC) services, including personal and nursing home care. The amount of LTC that is prepaid varies by type of CCRC, with one-third offering extensive (fully prepaid) contracts for LTC. CCRCs are a potentially promising model for LTC delivery because they offer a full continuum of services and can substitute less expensive supportive care for institutional care. Using data on CCRCs, we tested one central hypothesis: Provision of supportive services, particularly when combined with capitation, reduces use of nursing home care. To test this hypothesis, we studied the effect of various contract types for LTC services offered by CCRCs and provision of support services on utilization of nursing home and personal care units. Compared with other types of CCRCs, those offering completely prepaid LTC coverage reduced use of nursing home care by 13 percent and personal care by 5 percent. CCRCs with prepaid LTC coverage did not use more stringent health screening at entry, so "cream-skimming" does not appear to explain this result. However, affordability is an important issue: CCRC residents with extensive contracts were wealthier than were other CCRC residents.
持续照料退休社区(CCRCs)将住房与长期护理(LTC)服务相结合,包括个人护理和疗养院护理。预先支付的长期护理费用因持续照料退休社区的类型而异,三分之一的社区提供长期护理的全面(全额预付)合同。持续照料退休社区是一种潜在的有前景的长期护理服务提供模式,因为它们提供了完整的连续服务,并且可以用成本较低的支持性护理替代机构护理。利用持续照料退休社区的数据,我们检验了一个核心假设:提供支持性服务,尤其是与按人头付费相结合时,会减少疗养院护理的使用。为了检验这一假设,我们研究了持续照料退休社区提供的各种长期护理服务合同类型以及支持性服务的提供对疗养院和个人护理单元利用率的影响。与其他类型的持续照料退休社区相比,提供完全预付长期护理保险的社区将疗养院护理的使用减少了13%,个人护理的使用减少了5%。有预付长期护理保险的持续照料退休社区在入住时并没有进行更严格的健康筛查,因此“撇脂”似乎并不能解释这一结果。然而,可负担性是一个重要问题:签订全面合同的持续照料退休社区居民比其他居民更富有。