Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA.
J Health Econ. 2013 Sep;32(5):980-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.06.007. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
For the affluent elderly, continuing care retirement communities (CCRCs) have become a popular option for long term care and other health care needs related to aging. While CCRCs have experienced significant growth over the last few decades, very little is known about the quality of care CCRCs provide. This paper is the first to rigorously study CCRCs on a national scale and the only study that focuses on nursing home quality. Using a national sample from 2005, we determine if the quality of post-acute care provided by CCRC nursing homes is superior to traditional nursing homes. To mimic randomization of patients, instrumental variables analysis is used with relative distance as an exclusion restriction to handle the endogeneity of the type of facility where care is provided. After adjusting for endogeniety, we find that CCRC nursing homes provide post-acute care quality that is similar or lower to traditional nursing homes, depending on the quality measure.
对于富裕的老年人来说,持续护理退休社区(CCRC)已成为满足长期护理和与衰老相关的其他医疗需求的热门选择。虽然 CCRC 在过去几十年中经历了显著的增长,但对 CCRC 提供的护理质量却知之甚少。本文首次在全国范围内对 CCRC 进行了严格的研究,也是唯一一项专注于养老院质量的研究。我们使用 2005 年的全国样本,确定 CCRC 养老院提供的康复后护理质量是否优于传统养老院。为了模拟患者的随机分组,我们使用相对距离作为排除限制的工具变量分析来处理提供护理的设施类型的内生性。在调整内生性后,我们发现 CCRC 养老院提供的康复后护理质量与传统养老院相似或更低,具体取决于质量衡量标准。