• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加利福尼亚州医院所有和医生所有的医生组织中每位患者的总支出。

Total expenditures per patient in hospital-owned and physician-owned physician organizations in California.

机构信息

University of California, School of Public Health, Berkeley.

Integrated Healthcare Association, Oakland, California.

出版信息

JAMA. 2014;312(16):1663-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.14072.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2014.14072
PMID:25335148
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Hospitals are rapidly acquiring medical groups and physician practices. This consolidation may foster cooperation and thereby reduce expenditures, but also may lead to higher expenditures through greater use of hospital-based ambulatory services and through greater hospital pricing leverage against health insurers.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether total expenditures per patient were higher in physician organizations (integrated medical groups and independent practice associations) owned by local hospitals or multihospital systems compared with groups owned by participating physicians.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Data were obtained on total expenditures for the care provided to 4.5 million patients treated by integrated medical groups and independent practice associations in California between 2009 and 2012. The patients were covered by commercial health maintenance organization (HMO) insurance and the data did not include patients covered by commercial preferred provider organization (PPO) insurance, Medicare, or Medicaid.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Total expenditures per patient annually, measured in terms of what insurers paid to the physician organizations for professional services, to hospitals for inpatient and outpatient procedures, to clinical laboratories for diagnostic tests, and to pharmaceutical manufacturers for drugs and biologics.

EXPOSURES

Annual expenditures per patient were compared after adjusting for patient illness burden, geographic input costs, and organizational characteristics.

RESULTS

Of the 158 organizations, 118 physician organizations (75%) were physician-owned and provided care for 3,065,551 patients, 19 organizations (12%) were owned by local hospitals and provided care for 728,608 patients, and 21 organizations (13%) were owned by multihospital systems and provided care for 693,254 patients. In 2012, physician-owned physician organizations had mean expenditures of $3066 per patient (95% CI, $2892 to $3240), hospital-owned physician organizations had mean expenditures of $4312 per patient (95% CI, $3768 to $4857), and physician organizations owned by multihospital systems had mean expenditures of $4776 (95% CI, $4349 to $5202) per patient. After adjusting for patient severity and other factors over the period, local hospital-owned physician organizations incurred expenditures per patient 10.3% (95% CI, 1.7% to 19.7%) higher than did physician-owned organizations (adjusted difference, $435 [95% CI, $105 to $766], P = .02). Organizations owned by multihospital systems incurred expenditures 19.8% (95% CI, 13.9% to 26.0%) higher (adjusted difference, $704 [95% CI,$512 to $895], P < .001) than physician-owned organizations. The largest physician organizations incurred expenditures per patient 9.2% (95% CI, 3.8% to 15.0%, P = .001) higher than the smallest organizations (adjusted difference, $130 [95% CI, $-32 to $292]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

From the perspective of the insurers and patients, between 2009 and 2012, hospital-owned physician organizations in California incurred higher expenditures for commercial HMO enrollees for professional, hospital, laboratory, pharmaceutical, and ancillary services than physician-owned organizations. Although organizational consolidation may increase some forms of care coordination, it may be associated with higher total expenditures.

摘要

重要性

医院正在迅速收购医疗集团和医生诊所。这种合并可能会促进合作,从而降低支出,但也可能通过更多地利用医院门诊服务和对健康保险公司更大的医院定价杠杆导致更高的支出。

目的

确定在当地医院或多医院系统拥有的医生组织(综合医疗集团和独立实践协会)中,每位患者的总支出是否高于由参与医生拥有的组织。

设计和设置

从 2009 年至 2012 年,加利福尼亚州综合医疗集团和独立实践协会为 450 万名患者提供的护理总支出数据。患者由商业健康维护组织(HMO)保险覆盖,数据不包括由商业首选提供商组织(PPO)保险、医疗保险或医疗补助覆盖的患者。

主要结果和措施

每年每位患者的总支出,以保险公司为专业服务向医生组织、为住院和门诊手术向医院、为诊断测试向临床实验室以及为药品和生物制剂向制药商支付的费用来衡量。

暴露量

在调整患者疾病负担、地理投入成本和组织特征后,比较每位患者的年度支出。

结果

在 158 个组织中,118 个医生组织(75%)为医生所有,为 3065551 名患者提供护理,19 个组织(12%)由当地医院所有,为 728608 名患者提供护理,21 个组织(13%)由多医院系统所有,为 693254 名患者提供护理。2012 年,医生所有的医生组织每位患者的平均支出为 3066 美元(95%CI,2892 美元至 3240 美元),医院所有的医生组织每位患者的平均支出为 4312 美元(95%CI,3768 美元至 4857 美元),由多医院系统所有的医生组织每位患者的平均支出为 4776 美元(95%CI,4349 美元至 5202 美元)。在调整了该期间患者严重程度和其他因素后,当地医院所有的医生组织每位患者的支出比医生所有的组织高出 10.3%(95%CI,1.7%至 19.7%)(调整差异,435 美元(95%CI,105 美元至 766 美元),P = .02)。由多医院系统所有的组织每位患者的支出比医生所有的组织高出 19.8%(95%CI,13.9%至 26.0%)(调整差异,704 美元(95%CI,512 美元至 895 美元),P < .001)。最大的医生组织每位患者的支出比最小的组织高 9.2%(95%CI,3.8%至 15.0%,P = .001)(调整差异,130 美元(95%CI,-32 美元至 292 美元))。

结论和相关性

从保险公司和患者的角度来看,2009 年至 2012 年期间,加利福尼亚州由医院所有的医生组织为商业 HMO 参保人提供的专业、医院、实验室、制药和辅助服务的支出高于医生所有的组织。尽管组织合并可能会增加某些形式的护理协调,但它可能与更高的总支出有关。

相似文献

1
Total expenditures per patient in hospital-owned and physician-owned physician organizations in California.加利福尼亚州医院所有和医生所有的医生组织中每位患者的总支出。
JAMA. 2014;312(16):1663-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.14072.
2
Association of Financial Integration Between Physicians and Hospitals With Commercial Health Care Prices.医生和医院之间财务融合与商业医疗价格的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Dec;175(12):1932-9. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4610.
3
Annual Spending per Patient and Quality in Hospital-Owned Versus Physician-Owned Organizations: an Observational Study.患者年度人均支出与医院所有型和医师所有型医疗机构的质量:一项观察性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Mar;35(3):649-655. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05312-z. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
4
Consolidation of medical groups into physician practice management organizations.医疗集团合并为医师执业管理组织。
JAMA. 1998 Jan 14;279(2):144-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.2.144.
5
Who benefits from health system change?
JAMA. 2014;312(16):1639-41. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.13491.
6
The growth of medical groups paid through capitation in California.加利福尼亚州通过按人头付费的医疗集团的发展情况。
N Engl J Med. 1995 Dec 21;333(25):1684-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199512213332506.
7
Expenditures and Quality: Hospital- and Health System-Affiliated Versus Independent Physicians in Virginia.支出与质量:弗吉尼亚州医院及医疗系统附属医生与独立医生对比
South Med J. 2018 Oct;111(10):597-600. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000876.
8
Association of Organizational Factors and Physician Practices' Participation in Alternative Payment Models.组织因素与医生实践参与替代支付模式的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e202019. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2019.
9
Spending patterns in region of residency training and subsequent expenditures for care provided by practicing physicians for Medicare beneficiaries.住院医师培训地区的支出模式以及随后执业医师为 Medicare 受益人为提供的护理支出。
JAMA. 2014 Dec 10;312(22):2385-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.15973.
10
How HMOs assess medical groups and IPAs.健康维护组织(HMOs)如何评估医疗集团和独立执业协会(IPAs)。
Manag Care Q. 1997 Spring;5(2):1-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Value-Based Payment and Vanishing Small Independent Practices.基于价值的支付与小型独立诊所的式微
JAMA. 2024 Sep 17;332(11):871-872. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.12900.
2
Association between physician-hospital integration and inpatient care delivery in accountable care organizations: An instrumental variable analysis.医疗责任组织中医生与医院整合和住院医疗服务提供之间的关联:一项工具变量分析。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec;59(6):e14311. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14311. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
3
Small Independent Primary Care Practices Serving Socially Vulnerable Urban Populations.
服务于社会弱势群体的小型独立初级保健实践。
Ann Fam Med. 2024 Mar-Apr;22(2):89-94. doi: 10.1370/afm.3068.
4
Association of Clinician Practice Ownership With Ability of Primary Care Practices to Improve Quality Without Increasing Burnout.临床医生实践所有权与改善初级保健实践质量而不增加倦怠感的能力之间的关联。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Mar 3;4(3):e230299. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.0299.
5
Small practice participation and performance in Medicare accountable care organizations.小型医疗机构在医疗保险责任制医疗组织中的参与度和表现。
Am J Manag Care. 2022 Mar;28(3):117-123. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2022.88839.
6
Examining the Relationship Between the Lean Management System and Quality Improvement Care Management Processes.审视精益管理系统与质量改进护理管理流程之间的关系。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2022;31(1):1-6. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000318. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
7
Higher Medicare Spending On Imaging And Lab Services After Primary Care Physician Group Vertical Integration.初级保健医生集团垂直整合后,医疗保险在影像和实验室服务上的支出增加。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 May;40(5):702-709. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01006.
8
Changes in patient experience associated with growth and collaboration in general practice: observational study using data from the UK GP Patient Survey.患者体验随全科医疗的发展和合作而变化:来自英国全科医生患者调查数据的观察性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Nov 26;70(701):e906-e915. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X713429. Print 2020 Dec.
9
Primary care quality and cost for privately insured patients in and out of US Health Systems: Evidence from four states.私人保险患者在美国卫生系统内外的初级保健质量和成本:来自四个州的证据。
Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec;55 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):1098-1106. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13590. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
10
Organizational integration, practice capabilities, and outcomes in clinically complex medicare beneficiaries.临床情况复杂的医疗保险受益人的组织整合、实践能力和结果。
Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec;55 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):1085-1097. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13580. Epub 2020 Oct 26.