Schmid U D, Møller A R, Schmid J
Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Klinikum Grosshadern, München, Germany.
Muscle Nerve. 1995 May;18(5):487-94. doi: 10.1002/mus.880180503.
We studied responses from the masseter and nasalis muscles following magnetic stimulation (magStim) and compared these responses with those obtained by direct electrical stimulation of the trigeminal (NV) and facial (NVII) nerve near the root exit zone during microvascular decompression operations of NVII. We found that (1) magStim threshold to excite the nerve is high for NV and low for NVII; (2) excitation of all motor fibers is impossible for NV, and easy for NVII; (3) optimal coil placement is critical for NV, but not critical for NVII; and (4) between and within subjects, the excitation site is variable on NV, but stable on NVII. We estimated that the anatomical location of magStim to be either within or outside the cerebrospinal fluid for NV, and to be in the labyrinthine segment of the facial canal for NVII. Physical models explain and clinical lesion models support these differences found between NV and NVII.
我们研究了磁刺激(magStim)后咬肌和鼻肌的反应,并将这些反应与在面神经微血管减压手术期间在神经根出口区附近直接电刺激三叉神经(NV)和面神经(NVII)所获得的反应进行了比较。我们发现:(1)刺激三叉神经激发神经的磁刺激阈值高,而刺激面神经的阈值低;(2)不可能激发三叉神经的所有运动纤维,而激发面神经的所有运动纤维则很容易;(3)最佳线圈放置对三叉神经至关重要,而对面神经则不重要;(4)在受试者之间和受试者内部,三叉神经的兴奋部位是可变的,而面神经的兴奋部位是稳定的。我们估计,磁刺激的解剖位置对于三叉神经而言在脑脊液内或脑脊液外,而对于面神经而言在面神经管的迷路段。物理模型解释了这些差异,临床损伤模型也支持在三叉神经和面神经之间发现的这些差异。