Suppr超能文献

多通道尿动力学检查中记录到的直肠收缩的意义。

Significance of rectal contractions noted on multichannel urodynamics.

作者信息

Combs A J, Nitti V W

机构信息

Department of Urology, State University of New York, Health Science Center at Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA.

出版信息

Neurourol Urodyn. 1995;14(1):73-80. doi: 10.1002/nau.1930140112.

Abstract

Independent rectal contractions are frequently noted when performing multichannel urodynamics and are often considered to be artifactual. In an effort to determine if this activity is indeed significant, we reviewed 430 consecutive multichannel urodynamic studies performed on 289 patients. All studies were performed using an analog recorder at 0.5 mm/sec paper speed. Multichannel pressures included total vesical pressure measured by a urethral catheter, total abdominal pressure measured by a rectal balloon catheter, subtracted detrusor pressure (vesical minus abdominal), and uroflow measurement when possible. Rectal contractions were defined as multiple fluctuations in abdominal pressure as measured by the rectal balloon catheter which were independent of changes in total vesical pressure. These fluctuations could not be reproduced by abdominal stressing or Kegel-type maneuvers. Contractions were noted to be of high or low amplitude, continuous or intermittent. Of the 289 patients, 109 (38%) had a study positive for rectal contractions. Similarly, 168 of 430 studies (38%) were positive. In patients with neurologic disease, rectal contractions were noted in 61/120 (51%). In patients with no history of neurologic disease, 48/169 (29%) had rectal contractions (P < 0.001). Furthermore, when patients without a history of neurologic disease were evaluated with respect to the presence of detrusor instability, a positive study was noted in 27/67 (40%) with instability but in only 21/102 (21%) of patients without instability (P = 0.005). Rectal contractions also occurred with a higher frequency in patients with bladder hyperactivity of any etiology.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在进行多通道尿动力学检查时,经常会注意到独立的直肠收缩,且通常被认为是人为造成的。为了确定这种活动是否确实有意义,我们回顾了对289例患者进行的430次连续多通道尿动力学研究。所有研究均使用模拟记录仪,纸速为0.5毫米/秒。多通道压力包括通过尿道导管测量的膀胱总压力、通过直肠球囊导管测量的腹部总压力、减去的逼尿肌压力(膀胱压力减去腹部压力)以及尽可能进行的尿流测量。直肠收缩被定义为直肠球囊导管测量的腹部压力出现多次波动,且与膀胱总压力的变化无关。这些波动不能通过腹部加压或凯格尔式动作再现。收缩被记录为高振幅或低振幅、连续或间歇性。在289例患者中,109例(38%)的研究显示直肠收缩呈阳性。同样,430项研究中有168项(38%)呈阳性。在患有神经系统疾病的患者中,61/120(51%)出现直肠收缩。在无神经系统疾病病史的患者中,48/169(29%)出现直肠收缩(P<0.001)。此外,在对无神经系统疾病病史的患者进行逼尿肌不稳定情况评估时,有不稳定情况的患者中27/67(40%)研究呈阳性,而无不稳定情况的患者中仅21/102(21%)呈阳性(P = 0.005)。任何病因引起的膀胱活动亢进患者中,直肠收缩的发生率也更高。(摘要截断于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验